ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022
Geographic Distribution and Time Trends of Colorectal Cancer in Brazil from 2005 to 2018.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Pancreatitis in a Large Developing Country: Temporal Trends of Over 64,000 Hospitalizations from 2009 to 2019.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Involvement of platelet signaling pathways in colorectal cancer and new therapeutic targets.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Epidemiological Profile of Ophir Loyola Cancer Hospital: A Snapshot of the Incidence of Solid Neoplasms in the Eastern Amazon.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Rise of Gastrointestinal Cancers as a Global Phenomenon: Unhealthy Behavior or Progress?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Colorectal Cancer-The Worst Enemy Is the One We Do Not Know.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Spatial distribution of mortality from colorectal cancer in the southern region of Brazil.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the geographic distribution and time trends of CRC in Brazil.
methodsData were retrospectively retrieved from January 2005 to December 2018 from the Brazilian Public Health System. The incidence and lethality rates of CRC per 100,000 inhabitants in each municipality were estimated from hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths and were classified by age, sex, and demographic features.
resultsDuring the study period, the mean incidence of CRC estimated from hospitalizations and adjusted to available hospital beds more than tripled from 14.6 to 51.4 per 100,000 inhabitants (352%). Increases in CRC incidence were detected in all age ranges, particularly among people aged 50-69 years (266%). Incidence rates increased in all 5 macroregions, with a clear South to North gradient. The greatest changes in incidence and lethality rates were registered in small-sized municipalities. CRC lethality estimated from in-hospital deaths decreased similarly in both sexes, from 12 to 8% for males and females, from 2005 to 2018. The decline in lethality rates was seen in all age ranges, mainly in people aged 50 to 69 years (- 38%).
conclusionsCRC incidence is increasing, predominantly above fifty years of age, and also in areas previously considered as having low incidence, but the increase is not paralleled by lethality rates. This suggests recent improvements in CRC screening programs and treatment, but also supports the spread of environmental risk factors throughout the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35040020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.