Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039964›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the simplified chinese version of the fremantle back awareness questionnaire in patients with low back Pain.

Fanqi Hu, Chao Liu, Shiqi Cao, Xiangyu Wang, Weibo Liu, Teng Li, Xiaoqing Yang, Xuesong Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Metacognition impairment in stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fanqi Hu *Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Chao Liu *Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Shiqi CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Xiangyu WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Weibo LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Teng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Xiaoqing YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.
Xuesong ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China. zhangxuesong301@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1934-5717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Fremantle back awareness questionnaire (FreBAQ) was recently developed as simple and quick tool to assess back-specific body perception in Low back pain (LBP) patients. The aim of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Fremantle back awareness questionnaire (FreBAQ) into a Simplified Chinese version (FreBAQ-C), and evaluate the reliability and validity of the FreBAQ-C in patients with non-specific Chronic Low back pain (CLBP).

methodsThe FreBAQ was translated into Chinese according to established methods. Internal consistency was assessed according to Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was estimated by Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was evaluated by correlations between the FreBAQ-C and Visual analogue scale (VAS), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK) as well as Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).

resultsA total of 105 participants (38 males and 67 females) were included in this study with the mean age of 54.1 ± 15.6 years, mean duration of LBP of 6.8 ± 4.6 years. The FreBAQ-C total scores were well distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.833). ICC of test-retest reliability was good (0.897, 95% confidence interval: 0.852-0.929). The limits of agreement (LOA) ranged from - 5.8 to 6.3. The Standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimum detectable change (MDC) were 2.16 and 5.99. Construct validity was confirmed by significant correlation of The FreBAQ-C and VAS during motion (r = 0.274, p = 0.005) and rest (r = 0.243, p = 0.012), RDQ (r = 0.377, p < 0.001), PCS (r = 0.439, p < 0.001), and TSK(r = 0.311, p = 0.001).

conclusionsThe FreBAQ-C was demonstrated to have acceptable reliability and validity for patients with non-specific CLBP in Chinese mainland. It will allow evaluating body preception of the back in the Chinese population with CLBP.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAdultAgedChinaCross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBody perceptionFremantle back awareness questionnaireLow back painReliabilitySimplified chinese versionValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.