Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039803›Full record

ReviewSN computer science2022

Effectiveness of Instructional Strategies Designed for Older Adults in Learning Digital Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review.

Nahdatul Akma Ahmad, Muhammad Fairuz Abd Rauf, Najmi Najiha Mohd Zaid, Azaliza Zainal, Tengku Shahrom Tengku Shahdan, Fariza Hanis Abdul Razak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SN computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. "To Remember Is to Live Again": Geragogical Approaches to Online Storytelling With Older Immigrants.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Activity Engagement Across Stages of Cognitive Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nahdatul Akma AhmadFaculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Perak Branch, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1079-6116
Muhammad Fairuz Abd RaufFaculty of Communication, Visual Art and Computing, Universiti Selangor, Bestari Jaya, 45600 Selangor, Malaysia.
Najmi Najiha Mohd ZaidFaculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor, Bestari Jaya, 45600 Selangor, Malaysia.
Azaliza ZainalFaculty of Communication, Visual Art and Computing, Universiti Selangor, Bestari Jaya, 45600 Selangor, Malaysia.
Tengku Shahrom Tengku ShahdanFaculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor, Bestari Jaya, 45600 Selangor, Malaysia.
Fariza Hanis Abdul RazakFaculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ageing population is a universal phenomenon experienced worldwide. In parallel with these demographic changes, a significant breakthrough in digital devices has also influenced this digital age. Designing instructional strategies to promote meaningful learning among older adult learners has been a long-standing challenge. To enhance older adults' life-long learning experiences, implementing instructional strategies in the process through which such adults learn can help to improve effective learning. Despite significant calls for research in this area, there is still insufficient research that systematically reviews the existing literature on older adult learning needs and preferences. Hence, in the present article, a systematic literature review was conducted of the effectiveness of instructional strategies designed for older adult learners through the use of digital technologies. The review was guided by the publication standard, which is ROSES (Reporting Standard for Systematic Evidence Syntheses). This study involves articles selected from two established databases, Web of Science and Scopus. Data from the articles were then analysed using the thematic analysis, which resulted in six main themes: (1) collaborative learning; (2) informal learning setting; (3) teaching aids; (4) pertinence; (5) lesson design; and (6) obtaining and providing feedback. The six main themes produced a further 15 sub-themes. The results from this study make significant contributions in the areas of instructional design and gerontology. The findings from this study highlight several important strategies of teaching digital technology, particularly for older adults, as follows: (1) to enhance instructional design use in teaching digital technology based on the needs and preferences of older adult learners; and (2) to highlight the factors for, and impact of, learning digital technologies among older adults.

Indexed as

Digital technologiesEffectivenessInstructional strategiesOlder adultsSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID35039803
PMCPMC8754191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.