Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039620›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Objective evaluation of deep uncertainty predictions for COVID-19 detection.

Hamzeh Asgharnezhad, Afshar Shamsi, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Abbas Khosravi, Saeid Nahavandi, Zahra Alizadeh Sani, Dipti Srinivasan, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hamzeh Asgharnezhad *Individual researcher, Tehran, Iran.
Afshar Shamsi *Individual researcher, Tehran, Iran. afshar.shamsi.j@gmail.com.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abbas KhosraviInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Saeid NahavandiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Zahra Alizadeh SaniOmid Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dipti SrinivasanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful IslamInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research CouncilΓÇÖs Discovery Projects funding scheme Project DP190102181 and DP210101465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been widely applied for detecting COVID-19 in medical images. Existing studies mainly apply transfer learning and other data representation strategies to generate accurate point estimates. The generalization power of these networks is always questionable due to being developed using small datasets and failing to report their predictive confidence. Quantifying uncertainties associated with DNN predictions is a prerequisite for their trusted deployment in medical settings. Here we apply and evaluate three uncertainty quantification techniques for COVID-19 detection using chest X-Ray (CXR) images. The novel concept of uncertainty confusion matrix is proposed and new performance metrics for the objective evaluation of uncertainty estimates are introduced. Through comprehensive experiments, it is shown that networks pertained on CXR images outperform networks pretrained on natural image datasets such as ImageNet. Qualitatively and quantitatively evaluations also reveal that the predictive uncertainty estimates are statistically higher for erroneous predictions than correct predictions. Accordingly, uncertainty quantification methods are capable of flagging risky predictions with high uncertainty estimates. We also observe that ensemble methods more reliably capture uncertainties during the inference. DNN-based solutions for COVID-19 detection have been mainly proposed without any principled mechanism for risk mitigation. Previous studies have mainly focused on on generating single-valued predictions using pretrained DNNs. In this paper, we comprehensively apply and comparatively evaluate three uncertainty quantification techniques for COVID-19 detection using chest X-Ray images. The novel concept of uncertainty confusion matrix is proposed and new performance metrics for the objective evaluation of uncertainty estimates are introduced for the first time. Using these new uncertainty performance metrics, we quantitatively demonstrate when we could trust DNN predictions for COVID-19 detection from chest X-rays. It is important to note the proposed novel uncertainty evaluation metrics are generic and could be applied for evaluation of probabilistic forecasts in all classification problems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningCOVID-19HumansThorax

Identifiers

PMID35039620
PMCPMC8763911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.