ArticleScientific reports2022
Objective evaluation of deep uncertainty predictions for COVID-19 detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence to combat emerging viral syndemics: A systematic review.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Uncertainty quantification-based DMEFNet for reliable modelling of heart sound signals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated confidence estimation in deep learning auto-segmentation for brain organs at risk on MRI for radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Noise-induced modality-specific pretext learning for pediatric chest X-ray image classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Uncertainty quantification in multi-class image classification using chest X-ray images of COVID-19 and pneumonia.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Body composition predicts hypertension using machine learning methods: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Prediction Using Black-Box Based Pearson Correlation Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Dataset, Classification and Detection Using Deep Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- LiteCovidNet: A lightweight deep neural network model for detection of COVID-19 using X-ray images.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 chest X-ray detection through blending ensemble of CNN snapshots.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2022Article
- Prediction and forecasting of worldwide corona virus (COVID-19) outbreak using time series and machine learning.Concurrency and computation : practice & experience · 2022Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in Segmenting Tuberculosis-Consistent Findings in Frontal Chest X-rays.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Factors associated with mortality in hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients infected with COVID-19.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2022Article
- Automated Multi-View Multi-Modal Assessment of COVID-19 Patients Using Reciprocal Attention and Biomedical Transform.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Machine learning applications for COVID-19 outbreak management.Neural computing & applications · 2022Review
- Time series forecasting of new cases and new deaths rate for COVID-19 using deep learning methods.Results in physics · 2021Article
- Combining a convolutional neural network with autoencoders to predict the survival chance of COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Fusion of convolution neural network, support vector machine and Sobel filter for accurate detection of COVID-19 patients using X-ray images.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2021Article
- Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991-2020).Annals of operations research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been widely applied for detecting COVID-19 in medical images. Existing studies mainly apply transfer learning and other data representation strategies to generate accurate point estimates. The generalization power of these networks is always questionable due to being developed using small datasets and failing to report their predictive confidence. Quantifying uncertainties associated with DNN predictions is a prerequisite for their trusted deployment in medical settings. Here we apply and evaluate three uncertainty quantification techniques for COVID-19 detection using chest X-Ray (CXR) images. The novel concept of uncertainty confusion matrix is proposed and new performance metrics for the objective evaluation of uncertainty estimates are introduced. Through comprehensive experiments, it is shown that networks pertained on CXR images outperform networks pretrained on natural image datasets such as ImageNet. Qualitatively and quantitatively evaluations also reveal that the predictive uncertainty estimates are statistically higher for erroneous predictions than correct predictions. Accordingly, uncertainty quantification methods are capable of flagging risky predictions with high uncertainty estimates. We also observe that ensemble methods more reliably capture uncertainties during the inference. DNN-based solutions for COVID-19 detection have been mainly proposed without any principled mechanism for risk mitigation. Previous studies have mainly focused on on generating single-valued predictions using pretrained DNNs. In this paper, we comprehensively apply and comparatively evaluate three uncertainty quantification techniques for COVID-19 detection using chest X-Ray images. The novel concept of uncertainty confusion matrix is proposed and new performance metrics for the objective evaluation of uncertainty estimates are introduced for the first time. Using these new uncertainty performance metrics, we quantitatively demonstrate when we could trust DNN predictions for COVID-19 detection from chest X-rays. It is important to note the proposed novel uncertainty evaluation metrics are generic and could be applied for evaluation of probabilistic forecasts in all classification problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.