Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039614›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Informative predictors of pregnancy after first IVF cycle using eIVF practice highway electronic health records.

Tingting Xu, Alexis de Figueiredo Veiga, Karissa C Hammer, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis, Shruthi Mahalingaiah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association Between Post-Trigger Hormones andJournal of clinical gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tingting Xu *Center for Information and Systems Engineering, Boston University, 8 St. Mary's St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Alexis de Figueiredo Veiga *Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Building 1 655 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, 14th floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Karissa C HammerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 10, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ioannis Ch PaschalidisCenter for Information and Systems Engineering, Boston University, 8 St. Mary's St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Building 1 655 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, 14th floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. shruthi@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-5787
Boston University · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Optimizing and Learning Strategies for Protein Docking R01GM135930 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAKILI, PIROOZ · 2019 to 2021
$561k
National Science Foundation IIS-1914792NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135930Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health GM135930Office of Naval Research Global N00014-19-1-2571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the most informative pre- and in-cycle variables for predicting success for a first autologous oocyte in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. This is a retrospective study using 22,413 first autologous oocyte IVF cycles from 2001 to 2018. Models were developed to predict pregnancy following an IVF cycle with a fresh embryo transfer. The importance of each variable was determined by its coefficient in a logistic regression model and the prediction accuracy based on different variable sets was reported. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on a validation patient cohort was the metric for prediction accuracy. Three factors were found to be of importance when predicting IVF success: age in three groups (38-40, 41-42, and above 42 years old), number of transferred embryos, and number of cryopreserved embryos. For predicting first-cycle IVF pregnancy using all available variables, the predictive model achieved an AUC of 68% + /- 0.01%. A parsimonious predictive model utilizing age (38-40, 41-42, and above 42 years old), number of transferred embryos, and number of cryopreserved embryos achieved an AUC of 65% + /- 0.01%. The proposed models accurately predict a single IVF cycle pregnancy outcome and identify important predictive variables associated with the outcome. These models are limited to predicting pregnancy immediately after the IVF cycle and not live birth. These models do not include indicators of multiple gestation and are not intended for clinical application.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsFertilization in VitroPregnancy OutcomeAdultAge FactorsCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleForecastingHumansLogistic ModelsOocytesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35039614
PMCPMC8763861
OpenAlexW4205554102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.