Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039537›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Enhancing protein inter-residue real distance prediction by scrutinising deep learning models.

Julia Rahman, M A Hakim Newton, Md Khaled Ben Islam, Abdul Sattar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning to discover medicines.International journal of data science and analytics · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia Rahman *School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Southport, Australia. julia.rahman@griffithuni.edu.au.
M A Hakim Newton *Institute of Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Southport, Australia. mahakim.newton@griffith.edu.au.
Md Khaled Ben IslamSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.
Abdul SattarSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP180102727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure prediction (PSP) has achieved significant progress lately via prediction of inter-residue distances using deep learning models and exploitation of the predictions during conformational search. In this context, prediction of large inter-residue distances and also prediction of distances between residues separated largely in the protein sequence remain challenging. To deal with these challenges, state-of-the-art inter-residue distance prediction algorithms have used large sets of coevolutionary and non-coevolutionary features. In this paper, we argue that the more the types of features used, the more the kinds of noises introduced and then the deep learning model has to overcome the noises to improve the accuracy of the predictions. Also, multiple features capturing similar underlying characteristics might not necessarily have significantly better cumulative effect. So we scrutinise the feature space to reduce the types of features to be used, but at the same time, we strive to improve the prediction accuracy. Consequently, for inter-residue real distance prediction, in this paper, we propose a deep learning model named scrutinised distance predictor (SDP), which uses only 2 coevolutionary and 3 non-coevolutionary features. On several sets of benchmark proteins, our proposed SDP method improves mean Local Distance Different Test (LDDT) scores at least by 10% over existing state-of-the-art methods. The SDP program along with its data is available from the website https://gitlab.com/mahnewton/sdp .

Indexed as

Deep LearningAmino Acid SequenceDatasets as TopicModels, MolecularNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID35039537
PMCPMC8764118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.