ArticleScientific reports2022
Enhancing protein inter-residue real distance prediction by scrutinising deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MAKA-Map: Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Folding Mechanisms via a Hybrid Neural Framework Integrating the Mamba and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Distance plus attention for binding affinity prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Freeprotmap: waiting-free prediction method for protein distance map.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Learning to discover medicines.International journal of data science and analytics · 2022Review
- Inter-Residue Distance Prediction From Duet Deep Learning Models.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structure prediction (PSP) has achieved significant progress lately via prediction of inter-residue distances using deep learning models and exploitation of the predictions during conformational search. In this context, prediction of large inter-residue distances and also prediction of distances between residues separated largely in the protein sequence remain challenging. To deal with these challenges, state-of-the-art inter-residue distance prediction algorithms have used large sets of coevolutionary and non-coevolutionary features. In this paper, we argue that the more the types of features used, the more the kinds of noises introduced and then the deep learning model has to overcome the noises to improve the accuracy of the predictions. Also, multiple features capturing similar underlying characteristics might not necessarily have significantly better cumulative effect. So we scrutinise the feature space to reduce the types of features to be used, but at the same time, we strive to improve the prediction accuracy. Consequently, for inter-residue real distance prediction, in this paper, we propose a deep learning model named scrutinised distance predictor (SDP), which uses only 2 coevolutionary and 3 non-coevolutionary features. On several sets of benchmark proteins, our proposed SDP method improves mean Local Distance Different Test (LDDT) scores at least by 10% over existing state-of-the-art methods. The SDP program along with its data is available from the website https://gitlab.com/mahnewton/sdp .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.