Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039302›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Investigation of the relation between risk assessment of exposure and nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare workers: a prospective single-centre study.

Ayse Kaya Kalem, Bircan Kayaaslan, Fatma Eser, İmran Hasanoglu, Muge Ayhan, Belgin Coskun, Rahmet Guner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Factors associated with SARS-COV-2 positivity in nursing workers.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of onco-hematologic patients: a discussion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayse Kaya KalemInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey dr.aysekaya09@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-0066
Bircan KayaaslanInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatma EserInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
İmran HasanogluInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Muge AyhanInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Belgin CoskunInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rahmet GunerInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealthcare workers (HCWs) are among the risk groups for COVID-19. Determining transmission routes and risk levels during healthcare is of great importance in preventing nosocomial outbreaks. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of nosocomial transmission and factors affecting the transmission in HCW.

methodsHCWs admitted to the infectious diseases outpatient clinic due to contact with a COVID-19 patient and diagnosed with SARS-COV-2 by reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) between 20 March 2020 and 30 June 2020 were included in the study.

resultsA total of 822 HCWs with 295 low, 284 intermediate and 243 high-risk exposures were included in the study. 27.1% of the HCWs were male, and the median age was 31.9 years (20-62). 89.5% of these patients were directly in charge of patient care. Of the index cases contacted, 72.6% were HCW, and 27.4% were non-HCW patients. Most of the risky exposure (51.7%) occurred in nurses. The occurrence frequency of high-risk exposure was lower in those assigned to direct patient care when compared with the occurrence frequency of moderate-risk or low-risk exposures (76.5%, 94.7, 95.3, respectively p<0.001). In most high-risk exposures (220/253), the index cases were HCWs (p<0.001). Symptoms were detected in 311 of the HCWs (37.8%) during the follow-up. The median time to perform SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was 5.3 days (IQR) after the last risky exposure. In multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity was 5.65 times higher in HCWs not directly involved in patient care than HCWs who are not involved in patient care (95% CI 2.437 to 13.111; p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study provides particularly useful information on post-exposure COVID-19 follow-up and management of working schedules and procedures of HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross InfectionAdultHealth PersonnelHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2COVID-19infection controlquality in health carerisk management

Identifiers

PMID35039302
PMCPMC8764715
OpenAlexW4206784449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.