Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039284›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Multisite, mixed methods study to validate 10 maternal health system and policy indicators in Argentina, Ghana and India: a research protocol.

R Rima Jolivet, Jewel Gausman, Richard Adanu, Delia Bandoh, Maria Belizan, Mabel Berrueta, Suchandrima Chakraborty, Ernest Kenu, Nizamuddin Khan, Magdalene Odikro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

R Rima JolivetGlobal Health & Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA rjolivet@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1440-4722
Jewel GausmanWomen and Health Initiative; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9880-2591
Richard AdanuDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Delia BandohDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Maria BelizanInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mabel BerruetaInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Suchandrima ChakrabortyPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Ernest KenuDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Nizamuddin KhanPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Magdalene OdikroDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana, Legon, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Veronica PingrayInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sowmya RameshPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Niranjan SaggurtiPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Paula VázquezInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-6452
Ana LangerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost efforts to assess maternal health indicator validity focus on measures of service coverage. Fewer measures focus on the upstream enabling environment, and such measures are typically not research validated. Thus, methods for validating system and policy-level indicators are not well described. This protocol describes original multicountry research to be conducted in Argentina, Ghana and India, to validate 10 indicators from the monitoring framework for the 'Strategies toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality' (EPMM). The overall aim is to improve capacity to drive and track progress towards achieving the priority recommendations in the EPMM strategies. This work is expected to contribute new knowledge on validation methodology and reveal important information about the indicators under study and the phenomena they target for monitoring. Validating the indicators in three diverse settings will explore the external validity of results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational study explores the validity of 10 indicators from the EPMM monitoring framework via seven discrete validation exercises that will use mixed methods: (1) cross-sectional review of policy data, (2) retrospective review of facility-level patient and administrative data and (3) collection of primary quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional data from health service providers and clients. There is a specific methodological approach and analytic plan for each indicator, directed by unique, relevant validation research questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Office of Human Research Administration at Harvard University in November 2019. Individual study sites received approval via local institutional review boards by January 2020 except La Pampa, Argentina, approved June 2020. Our dissemination plan enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published research, including data sets. We expect to publish at least one peer-reviewed publication per validation exercise. We will disseminate results at conferences and engage local stakeholders in dissemination activities in each study country.

Indexed as

Maternal HealthPolicyArgentinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansObservational Studies as Topicgynaecologyhealth policyinternational health servicesobstetricspublic healthreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35039284
PMCPMC8765031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.