Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039207›Full record

ReviewAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Sunscreen lotions in the dermatological prescription: review of concepts and controversies.

Flavia Alvim Sant'anna Addor, Carlos Baptista Barcaui, Elimar Elias Gomes, Omar Lupi, Carolina Reato Marçon, Hélio Amante Miot

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Properties of Aspalathus linearis extracts as sunscreen agents in combination with standard UV filters.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Photoprotective efficacy of seed oils from fruits of Brazilian flora: a scoping review.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Latin American consensus on the treatment of melasma.International journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Saline extract ofToxicological research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Update on Melasma-Part II: Treatment.Dermatology and therapy · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Flavia Alvim Sant'anna AddorGrupo MEDCIN (Centro de Pesquisa Clínica), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: flavia.addor@medcin.com.br.
Carlos Baptista BarcauiDermatology Service, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Elimar Elias GomesCancer Center, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Omar LupiDermatology Service, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Policlínica Geral do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Clinical Immunology Service, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Carolina Reato MarçonDermatology Service, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hélio Amante MiotDermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo · BRCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin is regularly exposed to several environmental aggressions, including solar radiation, whose biological effects can induce sunburn, dyschromia, skin aging and cancer. Among the photoprotection measures, sunscreens comprise a relevant part of the strategy aimed to prevent solar radiation damage and, for effective action, the patient must adhere to the product use and the latter, in turn, must follow technical parameters to promote adequate protection. This review article brings together the most current and relevant concepts about photoprotection for dermatological use, including the challenges for their formulation, the risks of certain photoprotective active substances for individual and environmental safety and the importance of stringency in determining the product efficacy, considering the regulatory aspects, highlighting relevant differences between Brazil and other countries. Thus, when assessing a sunscreen, not only the visual aspects and sensory perception will be immediately evaluated, but also the quality and suitability of the vehicle, the chemical composition of the formulation, the environmental risks, the photostability of the screening system, and the measurement of its protection spectrum. Technical knowledge of sunscreens can help dermatologists in this important role of educating patients about the best photoprotective strategies in each situation.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSunburnHumansPrescriptionsSkinSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysSunscreening AgentsDermatologyDNA damageSkin neoplasmsSolar radiationSun protection factorSunscreening agentsUltraviolet rays

Identifiers

PMID35039207
PMCPMC9073257
OpenAlexW4206588936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.