ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2022
CNS Malformations in the Newborn.
Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Isolated Dandy-Walker Malformation: Exome Sequencing Efficacy and Phenotypic Expansions.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Intracranial Structural Malformations in Children in Tibet: CT and MRI Findings in a Single Tertiary Center.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- When neuroglial tissue wanders: a unique case report of subpleural heterotopia in a triploid foetus and review of the literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review of the Brain's Behaviour after Injury and Disease for Its Application in an Agent-Based Model (ABM).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Virus-Induced Epilepsy vs. Epilepsy Patients Acquiring Viral Infection: Unravelling the Complex Relationship for Precision Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Potential Role of Protein Kinase FAM20C on the Brain in Raine Syndrome, an In Silico Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Impact of theDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Interdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training applies neural exposome perspectives to neurology principles and practice.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural brain anomalies are relatively common and may be detected either prenatally or postnatally. Brain malformations can be characterized based on the developmental processes that have been perturbed, either by environmental, infectious, disruptive or genetic causes. Fetuses and neonates with brain malformations should be thoroughly surveilled for potential other anomalies, and depending on the nature of the brain malformation, may require additional investigations such as genetic testing, ophthalmological examinations, cardiorespiratory monitoring, and screening laboratory studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.