Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039042›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Effects of the addition of transcutaneous electrical stimulation to non-pharmacological measures in labor pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Naiara Toledo Dias, Patrícia Roberta Santos, Thais Alves Cândido, Rogério de Melo Costa Pinto, Ana Paula Magalhães Resende, Vanessa Santos Pereira-Baldon

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naiara Toledo DiasHealth Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Patrícia Roberta SantosHealth Sciences Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Thais Alves CândidoFederal University of Uberlândia, R. Benjamin Constant, 1286 - Nossa Sra. Aparecida, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-678, Brazil.
Rogério de Melo Costa PintoFederal University of Uberlândia, R. Benjamin Constant, 1286 - Nossa Sra. Aparecida, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-678, Brazil.
Ana Paula Magalhães ResendeFederal University of Uberlândia, R. Benjamin Constant, 1286 - Nossa Sra. Aparecida, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-678, Brazil.
Vanessa Santos Pereira-BaldonFederal University of Uberlândia, R. Benjamin Constant, 1286 - Nossa Sra. Aparecida, Uberlândia, MG, 38400-678, Brazil. vanessabaldon@ufu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-8821
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLabor, although natural and physiological, is a period that can be marked by stress, pain, anxiety, suffering, fear, and anguish for a woman. Thus, non-pharmacological methods that reduce pain during labor are important to allow a better experience without the use of medications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological pain relief methods, added or not to the application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS), on pain, satisfaction with the childbirth, duration of labor, and newborn conditions.

methodsThis is a randomized controlled clinical trial, with a non-probabilistic convenience sample, composed of women in the first active stage of labor, admitted to a public institution. The parturients will be divided into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopting different positions with the use of the Swiss ball and receiving back massage for 30 min; group 2 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will also have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopt different positions using the Swiss ball, and will receive the application of TENS for 30 min; and group 3 (n = 36) composed of parturients who will have continuous support and will be encouraged to walk, adopting different positions with the use of the Swiss ball, and will receive placebo TENS application for 30 min. The outcomes evaluated in the study will be pain intensity assessed by the visual analog scale of pain applied before, immediately after, and 30 min and 1 h after the interventions; Experience and Satisfaction with Childbirth Questionnaire (QESP) applied 12 to 24 h after delivery; and data regarding delivery (type of delivery, total duration of labor, and possible obstetric complications) and neonate (weight, height, possible complications, Apgar score in the first and fifth minutes). DISCUSSION: With this research, it is expected to understand the effects of the intervention through TENS electrostimulation added to other non-pharmacological methods for pain management during labor.

trial registrationBrazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) RBR-68kh6j . Registered on March 17, 2020.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricLabor PainTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationFemaleHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicElectrostimulationLaborNon-pharmacological pain relief measuresPain

Identifiers

PMID35039042
PMCPMC8762972
OpenAlexW4206263949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.