Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039012›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2022

One-year outcome of brain injured patients undergoing early neurological rehabilitation: a prospective observational study.

Melanie Boltzmann, Simone B Schmidt, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Joachim K Krauss, Günter U Höglinger, Jens D Rollnik

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Predicting outcome in disorders of consciousness: A mega-analysis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melanie BoltzmannBDH-Clinic Hessisch Oldendorf, Institute for Neurorehabilitation Research, Associated Institute of Hannover Medical School, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany. m.boltzmann@bdh-klinik-hessisch-oldendorf.de.
Simone B SchmidtBDH-Clinic Hessisch Oldendorf, Institute for Neurorehabilitation Research, Associated Institute of Hannover Medical School, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany.
Christoph GutenbrunnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Joachim K KraussDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Günter U HöglingerDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jens D RollnikBDH-Clinic Hessisch Oldendorf, Institute for Neurorehabilitation Research, Associated Institute of Hannover Medical School, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study intended to analyze the outcome of patients with severe brain injury one-year after discharge from early rehabilitation.

methodsEarly neurological rehabilitation patients admitted to intensive or intermediate care units and discharged between June 2018 and May 2020 were screened for eligibility. The level of consciousness was evaluated using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) upon admission and at discharge. At one-year follow-up, the outcome was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended (GOSE). Demographical and clinical data collected during inpatient rehabilitation were used to predict the outcome 1 year after discharge.

resultsTwo hundred sixty-four patients (174 males, 90 females) with a median age of 62 years (IQR = 51-75) and a median duration of their disease of 18 days (IQR = 12-28) were included in the study. At follow-up, the mortality rate was 27% (n = 71). Age and discharge CRS-R total score were independent predictors in a Cox proportional hazards model with death (yes/no) as the dependent variable. According to the GOSE interviews, most patients were either dead (n = 71; 27%), in a vegetative state (n = 28; 11%) or had a severe disability (n = 124; 47%), whereas only a few patients showed a moderate disability (n = 18; 7%) or a good recovery (n = 23; 9%) 1 year after discharge. Age, non-traumatic etiology, discharge CRS-R total score and length of stay independently predicted whether the outcome was good or poor at follow-up.

conclusionAge was an important predictor for outcome at one-year follow-up, which might be due to altered brain plasticity and more comorbidities in elderly subjects. In addition, the present study demonstrated that the CRS-R total score at discharge might be more important for the prediction of one-year outcome than the initial assessment upon admission.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesNeurological RehabilitationAgedBrainFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeBrain injured patientsComa recovery scale-revisedGlasgow outcome scale-extendedLong-term prognosisNeurological rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35039012
PMCPMC8762846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.