Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35039008›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Two novel prognostic models for ovarian cancer respectively based on ferroptosis and necroptosis.

Yang Li, Xiaojin Gong, Tongxiu Hu, Yurong Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Role of programmed cell death in platinum resistance in ovarian cancer].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Establishment of a Prognostic Necroptosis-Related lncRNA Signature in Ovarian Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Recent progress of ferroptosis in cancers and drug discovery.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of NADFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Current progress of ferroptosis study in ovarian cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Xiaojin Gong *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Tongxiu HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Yurong ChenDepartment of Oncology, Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji, 311800, Zhejiang, China. chenyurongtj@163.com.
Tianjin Hospital · CNZhuhai People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlatinum-resistant cases account for 25% of ovarian cancer patients. Our aim was to construct two novel prognostic models based on gene expression data respectively from ferroptosis and necroptosis, for predicting the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer patients with platinum treatment.

methodsAccording to the different overall survivals, we screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from 85 ferroptosis-related and 159 necroptosis-related gene expression data in the GSE32062 cohort, to establish two ovarian cancer prognostic models based on calculating risk factors of DEGs, and log-rank test was used for statistical significance test of survival data. Subsequently, we validated the two models in the GSE26712 cohort and the GSE17260 cohort. In addition, we took gene enrichment and microenvironment analyses respectively using limma package and GSVA software to compare the differences between high- and low-risk ovarian cancer patients.

resultsWe constructed two ovarian cancer prognostic models: a ferroptosis-related model based on eight-gene expression signature and a necroptosis-related model based on ten-gene expression signature. The two models performed well in the GSE26712 cohort, but the performance of necroptosis-related model was not well in the GSE17260 cohort. Gene enrichment and microenvironment analyses indicated that the main differences between high- and low- risk ovarian cancer patients occurred in the immune-related indexes, including the specific immune cells abundance and overall immune indexes.

conclusionIn this study, ovarian cancer prognostic models based on ferroptosis and necroptosis have been preliminarily validated in predicting prognosis of advanced patients treated with platinum drugs. And the risk score calculated by these two models reflected immune microenvironment. Future work is needed to find out other gene signatures and clinical characteristics to affect the accuracy and applicability of the two ovarian cancer prognostic models.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesFemaleFerroptosisHumansMiddle AgedNecroptosisOvarian NeoplasmsPlatinum CompoundsPrognosisRisk AssessmentTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorPlatinum CompoundsFerroptosisImmune microenvironmentNecroptosisOvarian cancerPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID35039008
PMCPMC8764839
OpenAlexW4205422638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.