Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038990›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Safe birth in cultural safety in southern Mexico: a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Iván Sarmiento, Sergio Paredes-Solís, Abraham de Jesús García, Nadia Maciel Paulino, Felipe René Serrano de Los Santos, José Legorreta-Soberanis, Germán Zuluaga, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson

Open access · goldAbstract readEquivalence TrialPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Iván SarmientoCIET-Participatory Research at McGill, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte des Neiges 3rd floor, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada. ivan.sarmiento@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-1464
Sergio Paredes-SolísCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-3038
Abraham de Jesús GarcíaCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-5480
Nadia Maciel PaulinoCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.
Felipe René Serrano de Los SantosCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.
José Legorreta-SoberanisCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-843X
Germán ZuluagaGrupo de Estudios en Sistemas Tradicionales de Salud, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5715-9133
Anne CockcroftCIET-Participatory Research at McGill, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte des Neiges 3rd floor, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-1106
Neil AnderssonCIET-Participatory Research at McGill, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte des Neiges 3rd floor, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-6918
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero · MXMcGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable research on the contribution of traditional midwifery to safe motherhood focuses on retraining and redefining traditional midwives, assuming cultural prominence of Western ways. Our objective was to test if supporting traditional midwives on their own terms increases cultural safety (respect of Indigenous traditions) without worsening maternal health outcomes.

methodsPragmatic parallel-group cluster-randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in four municipalities in Guerrero State, southern Mexico, with Nahua, Na savi, Me'phaa and Nancue ñomndaa Indigenous groups. The study included all pregnant women in 80 communities and 30 traditional midwives in 40 intervention communities. Between July 2015 and April 2017, traditional midwives and their apprentices received a monthly stipend and support from a trained intercultural broker, and local official health personnel attended a workshop for improving attitudes towards traditional midwifery. Forty communities in two control municipalities continued with usual health services. Trained Indigenous female interviewers administered a baseline and follow-up household survey, interviewing all women who reported pregnancy or childbirth in all involved municipalities since January 2016. Primary outcomes included childbirth and neonatal complications, perinatal deaths, and postnatal complications, and secondary outcomes were traditional childbirth (at home, in vertical position, with traditional midwife and family), access and experience in Western healthcare, food intake, reduction of heavy work, and cost of health care.

resultsAmong 872 completed pregnancies, women in intervention communities had lower rates of primary outcomes (perinatal deaths or childbirth or neonatal complications) (RD -0.06 95%CI - 0.09 to - 0.02) and reported more traditional childbirths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.18). Among institutional childbirths, women from intervention communities reported more traditional management of placenta (RD 0.34 95%CI 0.21 to 0.48) but also more non-traditional cold-water baths (RD 0.10 95%CI 0.02 to 0.19). Among home-based childbirths, women from intervention communities had fewer postpartum complications (RD -0.12 95%CI - 0.27 to 0.01).

conclusionsSupporting traditional midwifery increased culturally safe childbirth without worsening health outcomes. The fixed population size restricted our confidence for inference of non-inferiority for mortality outcomes. Traditional midwifery could contribute to safer birth among Indigenous communities if, instead of attempting to replace traditional practices, health authorities promoted intercultural dialogue.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered ISRCTN12397283 . Trial status: concluded.

Indexed as

Birth SettingCulturally Competent CareIndigenous PeoplesMidwiferyAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth FacilitiesHome ChildbirthHumansMaternal HealthMexicoParturitionPatient SafetyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsAboriginal healthCommunity health workerEquity in accessMe’phaa/TlapanecoNahuaNancue ñomndaa/AmuzgoNa savi/MixtecoRandomised controlled trialTraditional birth attendant

Identifiers

PMID35038990
PMCPMC8762841
OpenAlexW4205202306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.