Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038910›Full record

ArticlemBio2022

Genetic Dissection of Antibiotic Adjuvant Activity.

J Bailey, L Gallagher, W T Barker, V B Hubble, J Gasper, C Melander, C Manoil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BaileyDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washingtongrid.34477.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
L GallagherDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washingtongrid.34477.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
W T BarkerDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
V B HubbleDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
J GasperDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washingtongrid.34477.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.
C MelanderDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
C ManoilDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washingtongrid.34477.33, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-3434
University of Washington · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Development of Antibiotic Adjuvants for Gram-Negative BacteriaR01AI136904 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI MELANDER, CHRISTIAN COREY · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Defining the antibiotic intrinsic resistome of Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI148208 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MANOIL, COLIN · 2020 to 2021
$816k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136904NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecule adjuvants that enhance the activity of established antibiotics represent promising agents in the battle against antibiotic resistance. Adjuvants generally act by inhibiting antibiotic resistance processes, and specifying the process acted on is a critical step in defining an adjuvant's mechanism of action. This step is typically carried out biochemically by identifying molecules that bind adjuvants and then inferring their roles in resistance. Here, we present a complementary genetic strategy based on identifying mutations that both sensitize cells to antibiotic and make them "adjuvant blind." We tested the approach in Acinetobacter baumannii AB5075 using two adjuvants: a well-characterized β-lactamase inhibitor (avibactam) and a compound enhancing outer membrane permeability (aryl 2-aminoimidazole AI-1). The avibactam studies showed that the adjuvant potentiated one β-lactam (ceftazidime) through action on a single β-lactamase (GES-14) and a second (meropenem) by targeting two different enzymes (GES-14 and OXA-23). Mutations impairing disulfide bond formation (DsbAB) also reduced potentiation, possibly by impairing β-lactamase folding. Mutations reducing AI-1 potentiation of canonical Gram-positive antibiotics (vancomycin and clarithromycin) blocked lipooligosaccharide (LOS/LPS) synthesis or its acyl modification. The results indicate that LOS-mediated outer membrane impermeability is targeted by the adjuvant and show the importance of acylation in the resistance. As part of the study, we employed Acinetobacter baylyi as a model to verify the generality of the A. baumannii results and identified the principal resistance genes for ceftazidime, meropenem, vancomycin, and clarithromycin in A. baumannii AB5075. Overall, the work provides a foundation for analyzing adjuvant action using a comprehensive genetic approach.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCeftazidimeClarithromycinMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCeftazidimeClarithromycinMeropenemVancomycinAcinetobacteraminoimidazoleavibactambaumanniibaylyimeropenemTn-seqvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID35038910
PMCPMC8764523
OpenAlexW4205360477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.