Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038861›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2022

Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.

Linn Persson, Bethanie M Carney Almroth, Christopher D Collins, Sarah Cornell, Cynthia A de Wit, Miriam L Diamond, Peter Fantke, Martin Hassellöv, Matthew MacLeod, Morten W Ryberg and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
180.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Estimating the total mortality of seabirds following a marine heat wave.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities: Time for a Reboot.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  10. Embedding Chemistry and Pharmacy Into Sustainability.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Will Chemical Exposomics Be Ready for a Human Exposome Project?Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Linn PerssonStockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, Box 24218, 104 51 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7110-7089
Bethanie M Carney AlmrothDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 465, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-4612
Christopher D CollinsDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Reading, PO Box 217, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-2803
Sarah CornellStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4367-1296
Cynthia A de WitDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-2699
Miriam L DiamondDepartment of Earth Sciences; and School of the Environment, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 3B1.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-6431
Peter FantkeQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7148-6982
Martin HassellövDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 100, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Matthew MacLeodDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-7339
Morten W RybergQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-8729
Peter Søgaard JørgensenStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Patricia Villarrubia-GómezStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Zhanyun WangInstitute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-7659
Michael Zwicky HauschildQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKStockholm Resilience Centre · SEStockholm University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEETH Zurich · CHRoyal Swedish Academy of Sciences · SEStockholm Environment Institute · SEUniversity of Reading · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We submit that the safe operating space of the planetary boundary of novel entities is exceeded since annual production and releases are increasing at a pace that outstrips the global capacity for assessment and monitoring. The novel entities boundary in the planetary boundaries framework refers to entities that are novel in a geological sense and that could have large-scale impacts that threaten the integrity of Earth system processes. We review the scientific literature relevant to quantifying the boundary for novel entities and highlight plastic pollution as a particular aspect of high concern. An impact pathway from production of novel entities to impacts on Earth system processes is presented. We define and apply three criteria for assessment of the suitability of control variables for the boundary: feasibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness. We propose several complementary control variables to capture the complexity of this boundary, while acknowledging major data limitations. We conclude that humanity is currently operating outside the planetary boundary based on the weight-of-evidence for several of these control variables. The increasing rate of production and releases of larger volumes and higher numbers of novel entities with diverse risk potentials exceed societies' ability to conduct safety related assessments and monitoring. We recommend taking urgent action to reduce the harm associated with exceeding the boundary by reducing the production and releases of novel entities, noting that even so, the persistence of many novel entities and/or their associated effects will continue to pose a threat.

Indexed as

Earth, PlanetEnvironmental PollutionPlasticsPlasticscap on emissionschemical pollutionchemicals management capacityEarth system impactsplastic pollutionunknown planetary boundary threats

Identifiers

PMID35038861
PMCPMC8811958
OpenAlexW4205596113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.