Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038765›Full record

ArticleAllergy2022

The prevalence of non-allergic rhinitis phenotypes in the general population: A cross-sectional study.

Klementina S Avdeeva, Wytske J Fokkens, Christine L Segboer, Sietze Reitsma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rhinitis medicomentosa and substance addiction.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Occupational Rhinitis: An Update.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Research progress of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of chronic rhinitis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence and Clinical Findings of Nasopharyngeal Reflux in Patients With Idiopathic Nasal Symptoms: A Preliminary Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Klementina S AvdeevaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3910-4371
Wytske J FokkensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4852-229X
Christine L SegboerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands.
Sietze ReitsmaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLWestfriesgasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-allergic rhinitis (NAR) can be subdivided into several phenotypes: rhinorrhea of the elderly, rhinitis medicamentosa, smokers', occupational, hormonal, drug-induced, gustatory, and idiopathic rhinitis. There are two pathophysiological endotypes of NAR: inflammatory and neurogenic. Phenotypes may serve as an indicator of an underlying endotype and, therefore, help to guide the treatment. The prevalence of each phenotype in the general population is currently unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based study in the general population of the Netherlands.

resultsThe prevalence of chronic rhinitis in the general population was 40% (N = 558, of those, 65% had NAR and 28% AR, in 7% allergy status is unknown). Individuals with NAR (N = 363) had significantly more complaints in October-February. Those with AR (N = 159) had significantly more complaints in April-August. The most common NAR phenotypes were idiopathic (39%) and rhinitis medicamentosa (14%), followed by occupational (8%), smokers' (6%), hormonal (4%), gustatory (4%), and rhinorrhea of the elderly (4%). The least prevalent phenotype was drug induced (1%). Nineteen percent of the NAR group could not be classified into any of the phenotypes.

conclusionsThis is the first study to describe the prevalences of NAR phenotypes in the general population. AR and NAR have a distinct seasonality pattern with NAR being more prevalent in autumn/winter and AR in spring/summer. Our data on the prevalence of phenotypes may help clinicians to anticipate the type of patients at their clinic and help guide a tailored treatment approach. The high prevalence of rhinitis medicamentosa is alarming, since this is a potentially preventable phenotype.

Indexed as

RhinitisRhinitis, AllergicAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPhenotypePrevalenceRhinorrheaendotypeepidemiologynon-allergic rhinitisphenotypeprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35038765
PMCPMC9306544
OpenAlexW4206297943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.