Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038336›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Point-of-care semi-quantitative test for adherence to tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Derin Sevenler, Xin Niu, Sandy Dossantos, Mehmet Toner, Tim R Cressey, Rebecca D Sandlin, Paul K Drain

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Derin SevenlerCenter for Engineering in Medicine & Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0327-5638
Xin NiuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sandy DossantosCenter for Engineering in Medicine & Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Mehmet TonerCenter for Engineering in Medicine & Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Tim R CresseyPHPT/IRD-MIVEGEC, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Rebecca D SandlinCenter for Engineering in Medicine & Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Paul K DrainDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9569-4097
Harvard University · USUniversity of Washington · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS R01AI13664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesObjective measurement of antiretrovirals may aid clinical interventions for improving adherence to HIV prevention or treatment regimens. A point-of-care urine test could provide real-time information about recent adherence to regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide. We developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) and ELISA for urinary tenofovir.

methodsThe intensity of the LFA test line was quantified using an optical reader and visually scored 0-5 by two independent people, using a reference card. The sensitivity and specificity of both the ELISA and LFA were determined for two different tenofovir concentration cut-offs for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide adherence-1500 and 150 ng/mL, respectively. To validate the assays, we measured 586 urine samples from 28 individuals collected as part of a study of tenofovir pharmacokinetics in adults, which were also measured by MS for reference.

resultsBoth the LFA signal and ELISA signal were each strongly correlated with drug concentrations (0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The LFA signal and ELISA were highly sensitive and specific at both thresholds (LFA sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 89%/96%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 90%/96%) (ELISA sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 94%/94%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 92%/84%). Visual scoring of the LFA was also highly sensitive and specific at both the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate threshold and the tenofovir alafenamide threshold (sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 91%/94%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 87%/90%).

conclusionsOur rapid semi-quantitative test can measure tenofovir concentrations relevant to both tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate adherence, which may support adherence-promoting interventions across a range of HIV care settings.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsAdultAlanineEmtricitabineHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsTenofovirAlanineAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovirtenofovir alafenamide

Identifiers

PMID35038336
PMCPMC9126064
OpenAlexW4205213853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.