Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038121›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin as an Add-on to Standard of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Thailand.

Kriengsak Vareesangthip, Chaicharn Deerochanawong, Dittaya Thongsuk, Nuch Pojchaijongdee, Unchalee Permsuwan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chronic kidney disease in children: an update.Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kriengsak VareesangthipRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Chaicharn DeerochanawongRajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Dittaya ThongsukMarket Access and Government Affairs, AstraZeneca, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuch PojchaijongdeeMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Bangkok, Thailand.
Unchalee PermsuwanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. unchalee.permsuwan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-2789
Chiang Mai University · THMinistry of Public Health · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic kidney disease (CKD) creates a significant economic burden on patients and society. The DAPA-CKD trial reports the benefit of dapagliflozin in CKD patients; however, its cost-effectiveness is unknown in Thailand. This study evaluated the cost-utility of dapagliflozin in addition to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone in CKD patients.

methodsA Markov model was employed to estimate lifetime costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the modeled population aligned to the baseline characteristics of a DAPA-CKD trial, from a societal perspective. Effectiveness inputs were obtained from the DAPA-CKD trial. Costs and most utility data were gathered from published studies conducted in Thailand. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per annum. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsOver a lifetime horizon, add-on dapagliflozin was estimated to increase life-years by 0.34 and QALY by 0.30 in comparison with SoC alone (7.13 vs. 6.78 years, 5.10 vs. 4.80 QALYs). Total cost was lower under dapagliflozin treatment than SoC treatment (648,413 THB vs. 689,284 THB or 20,947.64 USD vs. 22,268.01 USD). Cost saving occurred as a result of the lower costs of dialysis and KT. The findings were robust to the changes of inputs.

conclusionsOn the basis of the DAPA-CKD trial, the add-on dapagliflozin results in cost saving compared favorably with SoC alone in Thailand. The benefit of dapagliflozin in delayed CKD progression is that it reduces the requirement for dialysis and KT, which can offset the costs of dapagliflozin and early CKD treatment.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicStandard of CareBenzhydryl CompoundsCost-Benefit AnalysisGlucosidesHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsThailandBenzhydryl CompoundsdapagliflozinGlucosidesChronic kidney diseaseCost-effectiveness analysisCost–utility analysisDapagliflozinSGLT-2 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID35038121
PMCPMC8918172
OpenAlexW4206672182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.