Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038043›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2022

Implementation of cellular bulk stresses in vertex models of biological tissues.

Shao-Zhen Lin, Matthias Merkel, Jean-Francois Rupprecht

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shao-Zhen LinCNRS and Turing Center for Living Systems, Centre de Physique Théorique, Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Matthias MerkelCNRS and Turing Center for Living Systems, Centre de Physique Théorique, Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Jean-Francois RupprechtCNRS and Turing Center for Living Systems, Centre de Physique Théorique, Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, 13009, Marseille, France. jean-francois.rupprecht@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8904-5878
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CONV- 0001gence Nationale de la Recherche ANR- 20-CE30-0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertex models describe biological tissues as tilings of polygons. In standard vertex models, the tissue dynamics result from a balance between isotropic stresses, which are associated with the bulk of the cells, and tensions associated with cell-cell interfaces. However, in this framework it is less obvious how to describe anisotropic stresses arising from the bulk of cells. In epithelia, such bulk anisotropic stresses could arise for instance through medial myosin fluctuations. Two recent publications-Tlili et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116(51):25430-25439, 2019) and Comelles et al. (eLife 10:e57730, 2021)-have proposed different schemes to implement bulk anisotropic stresses in vertex models. Here we show that while both schemes transform in the same way under affine deformations, they lead to significantly different tissue dynamics. Our results are consistent with the interpretation that the Tilli et al. scheme describes bulk stresses that are uniform within each cell, while the Comelles et al. scheme corresponds to non-uniform bulk stresses. Finally, we wondered whether a standard vertex model can be fully expressed in terms of bulk cellular stresses alone. We find that, in general, neither scheme can mimic the vertex forces created by cell-cell interface tensions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnisotropyEpithelium

Identifiers

PMID35038043
OpenAlexW4206680500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.