Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35038040›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Impact of lymphadenectomy on short- and long-term complications in patients with endometrial cancer.

Louisa Proppe, Ibrahim Alkatout, Ricarda Koch, Sascha Baum, Christos Kotanidis, Achim Rody, Lars C Hanker, Georgios Gitas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa ProppeDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. Louisa.Proppe@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1989-2267
Ibrahim AlkatoutDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Ricarda KochDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Sascha BaumDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Christos KotanidisDepartment of Gynecology, Vivantes Humboldt, Berlin, Germany.
Achim RodyDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Lars C Hanker *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Georgios Gitas *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly endometrial cancer is primarily treated surgically via hysterectomy, adenectomy and, depending on tumor stage and subtype, lymphadenectomy. Systematic lymph node dissection is known to cause surgical complications. The aim of the present study was to investigate morbidity and mortality rates associated with lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in a routine clinical setting.

methodsWe collected data from 232 patients who were operated for endometrial carcinoma between 2006 and 2018 at the University of Lubeck, Germany. Surgical complications were viewed in relation to surgical risk factors. Additionally, a questionnaire concerning long-term lymphatic complications and survival was completed. Survival was compared between patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (group I) and those who did not (group II).

resultsPatients in group I needed revision surgery significantly more often due to postoperative complications (such as lymphoceles) compared to those in group II (p = 0.01). The results indicate more serious complications in patients who underwent a systematic lymphadenectomy and in those with lymph node metastases. 15% of patients who underwent a systematic lymphadenectomy had lymph node metastases. Recurrences occurred in 12.5% of cases and were significantly more frequent in patients who had undergone a lymphadenectomy, even if the lymph nodes were negative (p = 0.02). A comparison of survival data during the follow-up period revealed no significant difference. The study highlighted the need for a better preoperative risk stratification and the avoidance of lymphadenectomy for surgical staging alone.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsLymphoceleFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingEndometrial cancerLymphadenectomyLymphatic complicationsSurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID35038040
PMCPMC9411244
OpenAlexW4226175605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.