Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037993›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2022

Effect of prone positioning on survival in adult patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laurent Papazian, Matthieu Schmidt, David Hajage, Alain Combes, Matthieu Petit, Guillaume Lebreton, Jonathan Rilinger, Marco Giani, Camille Le Breton, Thibault Duburcq and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. [Clinical study of prone positioning in invasive respiratory support for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Laurent PapazianAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France. laurent.papazian@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-9406
Matthieu SchmidtSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
David HajageSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Santé Publique, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, 75013, Paris, France.
Alain CombesSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Matthieu PetitSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Guillaume LebretonSorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Jonathan RilingerDepartment of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Marco GianiDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
Camille Le BretonAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 92700, Colombes, France.
Thibault DuburcqCHU Lille, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 59000, Lille, France.
Mathieu JozwiakCHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet 1, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 06200, Nice, France.
Tobias WengenmayerDepartment of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Damien RouxAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier, DMU ESPRIT, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 92700, Colombes, France.
Rachael ParkeCardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anderson LoundouCEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.
Christophe GuervillyAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Laurent BoyerCEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies support the potential efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) for improving survival in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases. Prone positioning (PP) has been shown to improve the outcomes of moderate-to-severe ARDS patients. Few studies and no randomized controlled trials have evaluated the effect of PP performed in ECMO patients.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of prone positioning for ARDS patients receiving vvECMO on survival. All authors were contacted to obtain complementary information not mentioned in the original articles. The main objective was to compare 28-day survival in vvECMO patients with PP to vvECMO patients without PP (controls).

resultsThirteen studies with a combined population of 1836 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. PP was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day survival (503 survivors among 681 patients in the PP group [74%; 95% CI 71-77] vs. 450 survivors among 770 patients in the control group [58%, 95% CI 55-62]; RR 1.31 [95% CI 1.21-1.41]; I

conclusionAccording to this meta-analysis, survival was improved when prone positioning was used in ARDS patients receiving vvECMO. The impact of this combination on survival should be investigated in prospective randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultHumansProne PositionProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesARDSECMOMeta-analysisMortalityProne positioning

Identifiers

PMID35037993
PMCPMC8762989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.