Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037985›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

A deep learning radiomics model may help to improve the prediction performance of preoperative grading in meningioma.

Liping Yang, Panpan Xu, Ying Zhang, Nan Cui, Menglu Wang, Mengye Peng, Chao Gao, Tianzuo Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A radiomics model enables prediction venous sinus invasion in meningioma.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liping YangPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Panpan XuPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Ying ZhangPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Nan CuiPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Menglu WangPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Mengye PengPET-CT/MR Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Chao GaoMedical Imaging Department, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Tianzuo WangMedical Imaging Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China. agntwz@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-8564

Funding

Haiyan Funding of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital JJQN2019-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of the enhanced-T1WI-based deep learning radiomics model (DLRM) in differentiating low- and high-grade meningiomas.

methodsA total of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas were consecutively enrolled (105 in the training cohort and 27 in the test cohort). Radiomics features and deep learning features were extracted from T1 weighted images (T1WI) (both axial and sagittal) and the maximum slice of the axial tumor lesion, respectively. Then, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was utilized to balance the sample numbers. The optimal discriminative features were selected for model building. LightGBM algorithm was used to develop DLRM by a combination of radiomics features and deep learning features. For comparison, a radiomics model (RM) and a deep learning model (DLM) were constructed using a similar method as well. Differentiating efficacy was determined by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsA total of 15 features were selected to construct the DLRM with SMOTE, which showed good discrimination performance in both the training and test cohorts. The DLRM outperformed RM and DLM for differentiating low- and high-grade meningiomas (training AUC: 0.988 vs. 0.980 vs. 0.892; test AUC: 0.935 vs. 0.918 vs. 0.718). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the DLRM with SMOTE were 0.926, 0.900, and 0.924 in the test cohort, respectively.

conclusionThe DLRM with SMOTE based on enhanced T1WI images has favorable performance for noninvasively individualized prediction of meningioma grades, which exhibited favorable clinical usefulness superior over the radiomics features.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAlgorithmsCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveDeep learningMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MeningiomasRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.