Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037979›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2022

[Guideline-based thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Andreas H Mahnken

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas H MahnkenKlinik für Diagnostischeund Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland. mahnken@med.uni-marburg.de.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is fifth most common cancer worldwide. The German S3 guideline on the diagnosis and the treatment of hepatocellular and biliary carcinoma was recently revised.

objectiveDetermination of the current status of thermal ablation in HCC according to the German S3 guideline. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on the current guideline and a selective literature search, the current status on indication and application of thermal ablation in HCC was revisited.

resultsRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) provide similar survival when compared with surgery. Accordingly, RFA und MWA are considered first-line treatments for HCCs ≤ 3 cm in cirrhotic livers. For HCCs with diameters of 3-5 cm, a combination of transarterial chemoembolization and thermal ablation is recommended.

conclusionThe current S3 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of HCC comprises relevant changes regarding thermal ablation in HCC. The overall role of interventional oncology procedures in the treatment of HCC was reinforced.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCatheter AblationChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsRadiofrequency AblationHumansMicrowavesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeInterventional radiologyLiver cancerMicrowave ablationRadiofrequency ablationThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID35037979
OpenAlexW4205577120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.