ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2022
[Robot-assisted surgery as an elective-fascinating lesson(s)?]
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic surgery undergraduate module: first formal curricular integration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though robot-assisted operations have evolved to a standard procedure in surgery, they are underrepresented in the curriculum of current medical students.
objectivesWe present our experience and findings in Germany's first elective "Robot-assisted surgery" at a urological department for undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen undergraduates in their final years were taught the theoretical basics and practical skills in robot-assisted surgery within six lessons each lasting 2 h, including the opportunity to observe a live robot-assisted surgery. The increase of knowledge (ten multiple-choice questions) and skills (exercises Camera 0, Clutch, and Sea Spikes 1) on a robotic simulation device were quantified including an evaluation of the student's perspective.
resultsThe 10 participants had a significant increase in knowledge and gave at a median of 3.5 additional correct answers in the final assessment (p = 0.011). For two out of three practical exercises, the overall score significantly increased (Camera 0 and Sea Spikes 1, for both p < 0.05), but for the exercise "Clutch", only economy of motion significantly improved (p = 0.028). The elective was evaluated (very) good and the willingness of the participants to become urologists significantly increased (p = 0.007).
conclusionThere is a great interest of many undergraduate medical students in robot-assisted surgery. Offering an elective appears to be an excellent format to teach the theoretical background and practical skills in robotic (urologic) surgery. Moreover, such an elective could raise more attention to the field of urology and might attract future colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.