ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2022
[S2K guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis (IC/BPS) : Discussion of the current guideline using a case study].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: The Gynecological Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- [Pelvic floor reconstruction-update 2024: prolapse-associated symptoms and their treatment].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IC/BPS is a chronic progressive disorder that is often difficult and unsatisfactory for the person affected and the treating therapist. Treatment should therefore be comprehensive, interdisciplinary, multimodal and take into account the biopsychosocial model. The guideline forms a thread through the diverse diagnostic and therapeutic options and provides extensive background information on the definition, epidemiology and aetiopathogenesis of this rare disease. However, practice and theory/guideline are different. Adaptation to the individual case is therefore necessary and explicitly desired. The guideline should therefore serve as a source of ideas for colleagues to compile their own standards suitable for their practice. On the one hand, therapy approaches that have been tried and tested in everyday clinical practice are passed on. On the other hand, the frequent lack of evidence should also be viewed critically. Further studies, if possible multi-centre, specifically designed for different aspects of IC/BPS would be desirable. Close networking between therapists in private practice and special centres is essential for the best possible treatment of people with IC/BPS. The guideline is intended to show the limits of what can be done in practices and outpatient clinics and to provide guidance on when patients should be referred to a "Centre for Interstitial Cystitis and Pelvic Pain". Overall, the guideline has improved the presence of this rare disease among colleagues. A comprehensive supplement, update and further substantiation with the state of current research is thus desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.