Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037969›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Development and external validation of a stability machine learning model to identify wake-up stroke onset time from MRI.

Liang Jiang, Siyu Wang, Zhongping Ai, Tingwen Shen, Hong Zhang, Shaofeng Duan, Yu-Chen Chen, Xindao Yin, Jun Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An Exploration of Pepino (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liang JiangDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Siyu WangDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Zhongping AiDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Tingwen ShenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare, Precision Health Institution, Shanghai, 200120, China.
Yu-Chen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Xindao YinDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China. y.163yy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-5201
Jun SunDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China. 13505194324@163.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

jiangsu provincial special program of medical science BE2017614the natural science foundation of jiangsu province BK20201118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and externally validate a machine learning (ML) model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) to identify the onset time of wake-up stroke from MRI.

methodsDWI and FLAIR images of stroke patients within 24 h of clear symptom onset in our hospital (dataset 1, n = 410) and another hospital (dataset 2, n = 177) were included. Seven ML models based on dataset 1 were developed to estimate the stroke onset time for binary classification (≤ 4.5 h or > 4.5 h): Random Forest (RF), support vector machine with kernel (svmLinear) or radial basis function kernel (svmRadial), Bayesian (Bayes), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), and neural network (NNET). ROC analysis and RSD were performed to evaluate the performance and stability of the ML models, respectively, and dataset 2 was externally validated to evaluate the model generalization ability using ROC analysis.

resultssvmRadial achieved the best performance with the highest AUC and accuracy (AUC: 0.896, accuracy: 0.878), and was the most stable (RSD% of AUC: 0.08, RSD% of accuracy: 0.06). The svmRadial model was then selected as the final model, and the AUC of the svmRadial model for predicting the onset time external validation was 0.895, with 0.825 accuracy.

conclusionsThe svmRadial model using DWI + FLAIR is the most stable and generalizable for identifying the onset time of wake-up stroke patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset. KEY POINTS: • Machining learning model helps clinicians to identify wake-up stroke patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset. • A prospective study showed that svmRadial model based on DWI + FLAIR was the most stable in predicting the stroke onset time. • External validation showed that svmRadial model has good generalization ability in predicting the stroke onset time.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeBayes TheoremDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesTime FactorsDiffusion-weighted imagingFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryMachine learningWake-up stroke

Identifiers

PMID35037969
OpenAlexW4206161761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.