Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037965›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2022

Can magnetic resonance imaging replace conventional computerized tomography for follow-up of patients with testicular cancer? A systematic review.

Jonas Busch, Stefanie Schmidt, Peter Albers, Julia Heinzelbecker, Sabine Kliesch, Julia Lackner, David Pfister, Christian Ruf, Christian Winter, Friedemann Zengerling and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas BuschDepartment of Urology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Jonas.busch@vivantes.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7093-5755
Stefanie SchmidtUroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Urologie, Berlin, Germany.
Peter AlbersDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julia HeinzelbeckerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Saarland University Medical Centre and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Sabine KlieschDepartment of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Hospital, Münster, Münster, Germany.
Julia LacknerUroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Urologie, Berlin, Germany.
David PfisterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christian RufDepartment of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Koblenz, Germany.
Christian WinterUrologie Neandertal (Regional Joint Practice), Erkrath, Germany.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dirk BeyersdorffClinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie · DEBundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DENeanderthal Museum · DESaarland University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFollow-up protocols for patients with testicular cancer (TC) have significantly reduced the number of cross-sectional imaging studies to reduce radiation exposure. At present, it is unclear whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could replace conventional computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The objective of this study is to summarize the scientific evidence on this topic and to review guideline recommendations with regard to the use of MRI.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed searching Medline and Cochrane databases for prospective studies on patients with TC in the follow-up care (last search in February 2021). Additionally, guideline recommendations for TC were screened. Data extraction and quality assessment of included studies were performed and used for a descriptive presentation of results.

resultsA total of four studies including two ongoing trials were identified. Overall, the scientific evidence of prospective comparative studies is based on 102 patients. Data suggest that abdominal imaging with MRI can replace conventional CT for detection of lymph node metastasis of the retroperitoneum to spare radiation exposure and contrast media application. However, experienced radiologists are needed. Clinical guidelines are aware of the risk of diagnosis-induced secondary malignancy due to CT imaging and some have adapted their recommendations accordingly. Results of the two ongoing trials on 738 patients are expected soon to provide more reliable results on this topic.

conclusionsThere is growing evidence that abdominopelvic MRI imaging can replace CT imaging during follow-up of patients with TC in order to reduce radiation exposure and diagnosis-induced secondary malignancy.

Indexed as

Testicular NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalProspective StudiesComputerized tomography imagingFollow-up careMagnetic resonance imagingMetastasisRecurrenceTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID35037965
PMCPMC9712293
OpenAlexW4206182479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.