Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037963›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2022

Recirculating hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with mitomycin C (HIVEC) versus BCG in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the HIVEC-HR randomized clinical trial.

Félix Guerrero-Ramos, Daniel A González-Padilla, Alejandro González-Díaz, Federico de la Rosa-Kehrmann, Alfredo Rodríguez-Antolín, Brant A Inman, Felipe Villacampa-Aubá

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Device-Assisted Therapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Félix Guerrero-RamosDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain. felixguerrero@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-3465
Daniel A González-PadillaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro González-DíazDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Federico de la Rosa-KehrmannDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Alfredo Rodríguez-AntolínDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Brant A InmanDivision of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Felipe Villacampa-AubáDepartment of Urology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) patients treated with BCG vs recirculating hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC).

methodsA pilot phase II randomized clinical trial was conducted including HR-NMIBC patients, excluding carcinoma in situ. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravesical BCG for 1 year (once weekly for 6 weeks plus subsequent maintenance) or HIVEC with 40 mg MMC, administered using the Combat BRS system (once weekly instillations were given for 6 weeks, followed by once monthly instillation for 6 months). Total recirculating dwell time for HIVEC was 60 min at a target temperature of 43° ± 0.5 °C. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoints were time to recurrence, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival at 24 months. Adverse events were routinely assessed.

resultsFifty patients were enrolled. Mean age was 73.5 years. Median follow-up was 33.7 months. Recurrence-free survival at 24 months was 86.5% for HIVEC and 71.8% for BCG (p = 0.184) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 95.0% for HIVEC and 75.1% for BCG (p = 0.064) in the per protocol analysis. Time to recurrence was 21.5 and 16.1 months for HIVEC and BCG, respectively. Progression-free survival for HIVEC vs BCG was 95.7% vs 71.8% (p = 0.043) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 100% vs 75.1% (p = 0.018) in the per protocol analysis, respectively. Cancer-specific survival at 24 months was 100% for both groups and overall survival was 91.5% for HIVEC vs 81.8% for BCG.

conclusionHIVEC provides comparable safety and efficacy to BCG and is a reasonable alternative during BCG shortages.

trial registrationEudraCT 2016-001186-85. Date of registration: 17 March 2016.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalAgedBCG VaccineHumansMitomycinNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineMitomycinBacillus Calmette–GuérinBladder cancerHyperthermiaProgressionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35037963
PMCPMC8994727
OpenAlexW4206752243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.