Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037950›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2022

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with head and neck cancer: a monoinstitutional, two-to-one pair-matching analysis.

Arnulf Mayer, Witali Wenzel, Daniel Wollschläger, Tilman Bostel, Maximilian Krüger, Christoph Matthias, Heinz Schmidberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts radiation-induced acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arnulf MayerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. arnmayer@uni-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3101-9180
Witali WenzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel WollschlägerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Tilman BostelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Maximilian KrügerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph MatthiasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Heinz SchmidbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

Varian Medical Systems n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout one fifth of patients with head and neck cancer are aged 70 years and older at the time of diagnosis. In these patients, risk factors (R1 status or extracapsular extension of lymph node metastases, ECE) often lead to a need for combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the postoperative setting. However, there is considerable concern about the toxicity of such therapy in this age group.

methodsRetrospective evaluation of the data of 53 patients ≥ 70 years of age who underwent surgery in our hospital between 1999 and 2015 for tumors of the oral cavity, the oropharynx, the hypopharynx, or the larynx, who subsequently received adjuvant radiation therapy. Two younger patients (< 70 years) were assigned to each of the elderly patients in a matching procedure based on anatomic sublocalization and tumor stage. The total cohort was comprised of 154 patients.

resultsUnivariate analyses revealed a statistically significant influence of many factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including Karnofsky performance score (KPS), alcohol consumption, smoking, R status, ECE, chemotherapy, and discontinuation of RT. Younger patients had better OS and PFS compared to the elderly (p = 0.013 and 0.012, respectively). In a multivariate Cox regression, no independent influence of age on OS and PFS was found. Survival was primarily dependent on the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT), application of the full course of RT, continued alcohol abuse, KPS, and the presence of ECE. Toxicity analysis showed a higher incidence of chronic renal failure but, generally, side effects for elderly patients were not substantially greater.

conclusionPerformance status and behavioral risk factors but not chronological age are crucial for the prognosis of patients who require adjuvant chemoradiation.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantHead and Neck NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesChemotherapyOverall survivalPerformance statusProgression-free survivalToxicity

Identifiers

PMID35037950
PMCPMC8789714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.