Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037895›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

A New Digital Assessment of Mental Health and Well-being in the Workplace: Development and Validation of the Unmind Index.

Anika Sierk, Eoin Travers, Marcos Economides, Bao Sheng Loe, Luning Sun, Heather Bolton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anika Sierk *Unmind Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-8075
Eoin Travers *Unmind Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-5533
Marcos EconomidesUnmind Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-5432
Bao Sheng LoeThe Psychometrics Centre, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-1608
Luning SunThe Psychometrics Centre, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-4278
Heather BoltonUnmind Ltd, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-8074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnmind is a workplace, digital, mental health platform with tools to help users track, maintain, and improve their mental health and well-being (MHWB). Psychological measurement plays a key role on this platform, providing users with insights on their current MHWB, the ability to track it over time, and personalized recommendations, while providing employers with aggregate information about the MHWB of their workforce.

objectiveDue to the limitations of existing measures for this purpose, we aimed to develop and validate a novel well-being index for digital use, to capture symptoms of common mental health problems and key aspects of positive well-being.

methodsIn Study 1A, questionnaire items were generated by clinicians and screened for face validity. In Study 1B, these items were presented to a large sample (n=1104) of UK adults, and exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the item pool and identify coherent subscales. In Study 2, the final measure was presented to a new nationally representative UK sample (n=976), along with a battery of existing measures, with 238 participants retaking the Umind Index after 1 week. The factor structure and measurement invariance of the Unmind Index was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity by estimating correlations with existing measures, and reliability by examining internal consistency and test-retest intraclass correlations.

resultsStudies 1A and 1B yielded a 26-item measure with 7 subscales: Calmness, Connection, Coping, Happiness, Health, Fulfilment, and Sleep. Study 2 showed that the Unmind Index is fitted well by a second-order factor structure, where the 7 subscales all load onto an overall MHWB factor, and established measurement invariance by age and gender. Subscale and total scores correlate well with existing mental health measures and generally diverge from personality measures. Reliability was good or excellent across all subscales.

conclusionsThe Unmind Index is a robust measure of MHWB that can help to identify target areas for intervention in nonclinical users of a mental health app. We argue that there is value in measuring mental ill health and mental well-being together, rather than treating them as separate constructs.

Indexed as

measurementmental healthmHealthwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35037895
PMCPMC8804960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.