Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037883›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Women Treated for Breast Cancer to Manage Chronic Pain and Symptoms Related to Lymphedema: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mei Rosemary Fu, Deborah Axelrod, Amber A Guth, Joan Scagliola, Kavita Rampertaap, Nardin El-Shammaa, Jeanna M Qiu, Melissa L McTernan, Laura Frye, Christopher S Park and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02462226 nacompletednot on this map

The-Optimal-Lymph-Flow ™: An e-Health Approach to Enhancing Management of Chronic Pain and Symptoms Related to Lymphedema Among Women Treated for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2015 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsBreast Cancer, Pain, LymphedemaArmsThe-Optimal-Lymph-Flow, Arm Precaution
NCT05834400 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Lymphatic System Stimulation and Fluid Overload Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsHeart FailureArmsThe Optimal Lymph FLow (TOLF), Daily Monitoring
NCT06128655 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Testing a Nurse-Led Technology-Enhanced Family Engagement Program (NURSE-TECH-Family) Among Critically Ill Patients in ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled29ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsParticipation in PFCC-IR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mei Rosemary FuSchool of Nursing-Camden, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3891-0109
Deborah AxelrodDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-3389
Amber A GuthDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2658-4089
Joan ScagliolaNYU Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-0803
Kavita RampertaapMount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-680X
Nardin El-ShammaaRowan School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-1813
Jeanna M QiuHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-8548
Melissa L McTernanResearch Services, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-8307
Laura FryeCollege of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4067-016X
Christopher S ParkCollege of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-7080
Gary YuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8333-5222
Charles TilleyRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-0446
Yao WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-3802
New York University · USBoston College · USHarvard University · USMount Sinai Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · USRowan University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe-Optimal-Lymph-Flow (TOLF) is a patient-centered, web- and mobile-based mHealth system that delivers safe, easy, and feasible digital therapy of lymphatic exercises and limb mobility exercises.

objectiveThe purpose of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effectiveness of the web- and mobile-based TOLF system for managing chronic pain and symptoms related to lymphedema. The primary outcome includes pain reduction, and the secondary outcomes focus on symptom relief, limb volume difference measured by infrared perometer, BMI, and quality of life (QOL) related to pain. We hypothesized that participants in the intervention group would have improved pain and symptom experiences, limb volume difference, BMI, and QOL.

methodsA parallel RCT with a control-experimental, pre- and posttest, and repeated-measures design were used. A total of 120 patients were recruited face-to-face at the point of care during clinical visits. Patients were randomized according to pain in a 1:1 ratio into either the arm precaution (AP) control group to improve limb mobility and arm protection or The-Optimal-Lymph flow (TOLF) intervention group to promote lymph flow and limb mobility. Trial outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at week 12 after the intervention. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, t test, and generalized linear mixed effects models were performed for data analysis.

resultsAt the study endpoint of 12 weeks, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF intervention group compared with the AP control group reported chronic pain (45% [27/60] vs 70% [42/60]; odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90; P=.02). Patients who received the TOLF intervention were significantly more likely to achieve a complete reduction in pain (50% [23/46] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.39-9.76; P=.005) and soreness (43% [21/49] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.03-6.81; P=.03). Significantly lower median severity scores were found in the TOLF group for chronic pain (MedTOLF=0, IQR 0-1 vs MedAP=1, IQR 0-2; P=.02) and general bodily pain (MedTOLF=1, IQR=0-1.5 vs MedAP=1, IQR 1-3; P=.04). Compared with the AP control group, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF group reported arm/hand swelling (P=.04), heaviness (P=.03), redness (P=.03), and limited movement in shoulder (P=.02) and arm (P=.03). No significant differences between the TOLF and AP groups were found in complete reduction of aching (P=.12) and tenderness (P=.65), mean numbers of lymphedema symptom reported (P=.11), ≥5% limb volume differences (P=.48), and BMI (P=.12).

conclusionsThe TOLF intervention had significant benefits for breast cancer survivors to manage chronic pain, soreness, general bodily pain, arm/hand swelling, heaviness, and impaired limb mobility. The intervention resulted in a 13% reduction (from 40% [24/60] to 27% [16/60]) in proportions of patients who took pain medications compared with the AP control group, which had a 5% increase (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]). A 12% reduction (from 27% [16/60] to 15% [9/60]) in proportions of patients with ≥5% limb volume differences was found in the TOLF intervention, while a 5% increase in the AP control group (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]) was found. In conclusion, the TOLF intervention can be a better choice for breast cancer survivors to reduce chronic pain and limb volume.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02462226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02462226. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.5104.

Indexed as

breast cancerhealth behaviorlymphatic exerciseslymphedemamHealthpainsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID35037883
PMCPMC8893593
OpenAlexW3215216707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.