Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037168›Full record

ReviewApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2022

Nematodes as Ghosts of Land Use Past: Elucidating the Roles of Soil Nematode Community Studies as Indicators of Soil Health and Land Management Practices.

Debraj Biswal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Debraj BiswalDepartment of Zoology, Government General Degree College at Mangalkote, Burdwan, West Bengal, 713132, India. debhraj@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-6774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil health is a matter of growing concern because of its degradation due to unsustainable anthropogenic activities over the last few decades. It is maintained by interactions among the components of the soil food web commonly concentrated in the vicinity of the plant roots, called the rhizosphere. The soil food web is dominated by nematodes. They occupy various trophic positions because of their diverse feeding habits. The free-living forms are mainly dependent on soil bacteria and fungi for their nutrition, while the parasitic forms feed on plant roots. The population of these two groups is regulated by the activities of predatory nematodes which can be carnivorous or omnivorous. The soil nematodes thereby partake responsibilities in nutrient cycling, mineralization and decomposition pathways which, in turn, affects the aboveground productivity. This intricately connected food web structure is vulnerable to disturbances like increased soil salinity, acidity, nitrogen enrichment, tillage, crop rotations, fertilizers, pesticides, soil amendment techniques and heavy metal pollution. The effects are reflected by alterations in the abundance and diversity of soil nematodes belonging to various trophic groups. These alterations have been formulated into measurable indices like maturity index (MI), structure index (SI), enrichment index (EI) and channel index (CI). The faunal profile and metabolic footprints of soil nematodes are latest developments in the field of nematode community analyses. Though these indices cannot replace the conventional soil ecotoxicological assays, they can give added information about soil biology which can be utilized to design sustainable land use practices.

Indexed as

NematodaSoilAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFungiSoil MicrobiologySoilNematode community indicesNematodesRhizosphereSoil food webSoil healthSustainable land use

Identifiers

PMID35037168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.