Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037136›Full record

Observational studyActa diabetologica2022

The impact of fetal sex on risk factors for gestational diabetes and related adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Giuseppe Seghieri, Graziano Di Cianni, Elisa Gualdani, Alessandra De Bellis, Flavia Franconi, Paolo Francesconi

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta diabetologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The influence of fetal sex on antenatal maternal glucose and insulin dynamics.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe SeghieriEpidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141, Florence, Italy. gseghier@tin.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-4455
Graziano Di CianniDiabetes and Metabolic Diseases Unit, Health Local Unit North-West Tuscany, Livorno, Italy.
Elisa GualdaniEpidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Alessandra De BellisDiabetes and Metabolic Diseases Unit, "San Giovanni di Dio Hospital", Florence, Italy.
Flavia FranconiLaboratorio Nazionale di Farmacologia e Medicina di Genere, Istituto Nazionale Biostrutture Biosistemi, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Paolo FrancesconiEpidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Via Pietro Dazzi 1, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte · ITNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate whether fetal sex affects the impact of classical GDM risk factors on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) as well as on related adverse pregnancy outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective observational study concerned 206,917 singleton live births born to 170,126 women aged 15-45 over the years 2010-2018 in Tuscany, Italy. GDM was identified by administrative data-sources in 21,613 pregnancies (10.5%) by assessing, through multiple logistic models, whether fetal sex modified the risk of GDM driven by maternal risk factors, and whether it modified the risk of adverse outcomes such as prematurity (birth ≤ 37th gestational week), large for gestational age (LGA), unplanned caesarean sections, or 5-min-Apgar-index ≤ 7 in pregnancies with GDM.

resultsGDM was diagnosed in 21,613 pregnancies (10.5%). Male fetal sex predicted a higher adjusted risk of GDM: OR = 1.05(95% CI: 1.01-1.07); p < 0.0009. In pregnancies with female sex, pre-pregnancy obesity amplified the risk of GDM: OR = 1.09(95% CI: 1.01-1.19); p =  0.04. In pregnancies with GDM, carrying a female fetus increased the risk of LGA associated with pregestational obesity OR = 1.45(95% CI: 1.15-1.81); p = 0.001, and in primiparous pregnancies, it protected mothers from the risk of unplanned caesarean sections OR = 0.80(95%CI: 0.67-0.92); p = 0.001.

conclusionsWhile male fetal sex is associated with rise in the risk of GDM, giving birth to a girl amplifies the excess GDM risk driven by pregestational obesity, thus increasing the risk of LGA in pregnancies with GDM. Additionally, female fetal sex in pregnancies with GDM seems to protect from the risk of unplanned caesarean sections in primiparous pregnancies.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansMaleObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWeight GainFetal sexGestational diabetesPregnancy adverse outcomesRisk factors for gestational diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35037136
OpenAlexW4205201173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.