Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037118›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial.

Qingfen Zhang, Ying Wang, Shuang Yang, Qian Wu, Wanmin Qiang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prevention of radiation dermatitis with skin hygiene and washing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingfen ZhangRadiotherapy Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ying WangNursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shuang YangRadiotherapy Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qian WuRadiotherapy Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wanmin QiangNursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China. wanminqiang2020@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-1368

Funding

Nursing Department Fund TJMUCH-H-2018-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

methodsA total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL).

resultsThere were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05).

conclusionWashing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiodermatitisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaQuality of LifeNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNursingQuality of lifeRadiation dermatitisRadiotherapySkin care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.