Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35037088›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework.

Gauthier Dot, Thomas Schouman, Guillaume Dubois, Philippe Rouch, Laurent Gajny

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Brain midline segmentation method based on prior knowledge and path optimization].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gauthier DotInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France. gauthier.dot@ensam.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-2623
Thomas SchoumanInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
Guillaume DuboisInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
Philippe RouchInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
Laurent GajnyInstitut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
Arts et Métiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of the nnU-Net open-source deep learning framework for automatic multi-task segmentation of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) structures in CT scans obtained for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery.

methodsFour hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients having undergone high-resolution CT scans before orthognathic surgery were randomly distributed among a training/validation cohort (n = 300) and a testing cohort (n = 153). The ground truth segmentations were generated by 2 operators following an industry-certified procedure for use in computer-assisted surgical planning and personalized implant manufacturing. Model performance was assessed by comparing model predictions with ground truth segmentations. Examination of 45 CT scans by an industry expert provided additional evaluation. The model's generalizability was tested on a publicly available dataset of 10 CT scans with ground truth segmentation of the mandible.

resultsIn the test cohort, mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC) and surface Dice similarity coefficient at 1 mm (sDSC) were 0.96 and 0.97 for the upper skull, 0.94 and 0.98 for the mandible, 0.95 and 0.99 for the upper teeth, 0.94 and 0.99 for the lower teeth, and 0.82 and 0.98 for the mandibular canal. Industry expert segmentation approval rates were 93% for the mandible, 89% for the mandibular canal, 82% for the upper skull, 69% for the upper teeth, and 58% for the lower teeth.

conclusionWhile additional efforts are required for the segmentation of dental apices, our results demonstrated the model's reliability in terms of fully automatic segmentation of preoperative orthognathic CT scans. KEY POINTS: • The nnU-Net deep learning framework can be trained out-of-the-box to provide robust fully automatic multi-task segmentation of CT scans performed for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning. • The clinical viability of the trained nnU-Net model is shown on a challenging test dataset of 153 CT scans randomly selected from clinical practice, showing metallic artifacts and diverse anatomical deformities. • Commonly used biomedical segmentation evaluation metrics (volumetric and surface Dice similarity coefficient) do not always match industry expert evaluation in the case of more demanding clinical applications.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedOrthognathic SurgeryComputersHumansReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningOrthognathic surgerySurgery, computer-assistedTomography, x-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35037088
OpenAlexW4225463701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.