Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036998›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Health care utilization following "digi-physical" assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care.

Artin Entezarjou, Maria Sjöbeck, Patrik Midlöv, Veronica Milos Nymberg, Lina Vigren, Ashkan Labaf, Ulf Jakobsson, Susanna Calling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03474887 (Digital Online Consultations - Effects on Antibiotic Prescribing and Health Care Utilization in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03474887 completednot on this map

Digital Online Consultations - Effects on Antibiotic Prescribing and Health Care Utilization in Primary Care

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2018 to 2021Enrolled4,057ConditionsSore Throat, Dysuria, Cough, Common ColdArmsPhysical Consultation, Online Consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Artin EntezarjouDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Maria SjöbeckDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Patrik MidlövDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Veronica Milos NymbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Lina VigrenCapio Go, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ashkan LabafDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulf JakobssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Susanna CallingDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, 20213 Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SECapio Lundby Sjukhus · SEMalmö University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of chat-based digital visits (eVisits) to assess infectious symptoms in primary care is rapidly increasing. The "digi-physical" model of care uses eVisits as the first line of assessment while assuming a certain proportion of patients will inevitably need to be further assessed through urgent physical examination within 48 h. It is unclear to what extent this approach can mitigate physical visits compared to assessing patients directly using office visits.

methodsThis pre-COVID-19-pandemic observational study followed up "digi-physical" eVisit patients (

resultsNo significant differences in subsequent physical visits within two weeks (excluding the first 48 h) were noted following "digi-physical" care compared to office visits (179 (18.0%) vs. 102 (17.6%),

conclusionsMost eVisit patients (68.9%) with respiratory and urinary symptoms have no subsequent physical visits. Beyond an unavoidable portion of patients requiring urgent physical examination within 48 h, "digi-physical" management of respiratory and urinary symptoms results in comparable subsequent health care utilization compared to office visits. eVisit providers may need to optimize use of resources to minimize the proportion of patients being assessed both digitally and physically within 48 h as part of the "digi-physical" concept.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03474887. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2.

Indexed as

eVisitsInfectionPrimary careTelehealthTelemedicineUtilization

Identifiers

PMID35036998
PMCPMC8753946
OpenAlexW4205580459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.