Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036990›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2020

Blockade of Catecholamine Reuptake in the Prelimbic Cortex Decreases Top-down Attentional Control in Response to Novel, but Not Familiar Appetitive Distracters, within a Timing Paradigm.

Alexander R Matthews, Mona Buhusi, Catalin V Buhusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander R MatthewsInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, USTAR BioInnovations Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Mona BuhusiInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, USTAR BioInnovations Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Catalin V BuhusiInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, USTAR BioInnovations Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.

Funding

ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH065561 · NIMH · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2002 to 2013
$2.0M
REPRESENTATION OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH073057 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2006 to 2009
$824k
Striatal Mechanisms of Timed Response SelectionR21NS109723 · NINDS · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUHUSI, MONA · 2019 to 2019
$395k
ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR56MH065561 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2009 to 2009
$286k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073057NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH065561NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS109723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotionally charged distracters delay timing behavior. Increasing catecholamine levels within the prelimbic cortex has beneficial effects on timing by decreasing the delay after aversive distracters. We examined whether increasing catecholamine levels within the prelimbic cortex also protects against the deleterious timing delays caused by novel distracters or by familiar appetitive distracters. Rats were trained in a peak-interval procedure and tested in trials with either a novel (unreinforced) distracter, a familiar appetitive (food-reinforced) distracter, or no distracter after being locally infused within the prelimbic cortex with catecholamine reuptake blocker nomifensine. Prelimbic infusion of nomifensine did not alter timing accuracy and precision. However, it increased the delay caused by novel distracters in an inverted-U dose-dependent manner, while being ineffective for appetitive distracters. Together with previous data, these results suggest that catecholaminergic modulation of prelimbic top-down attentional control of interval timing varies with distracter's valence: prelimbic catecholamines increase attentional control when presented with familiar aversive distracters, have no effect on familiar neutral or familiar appetitive distracters, and decrease it when presented with novel distracters. These findings detail complex interactions between catecholaminergic modulation of attention to timing and nontemporal properties of stimuli, which should be considered when developing therapeutic methods for attentional or affective disorders.

Indexed as

attentioncatecholaminenomifensinepeak-intervalprelimbic cortextiming

Identifiers

PMID35036990
PMCPMC8758100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.