Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036975›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare in China: a living scoping review.

Junqiang Zhao, Wenhui Bai, Qian Zhang, Yujie Su, Jinfang Wang, Xiaoning Du, Yajing Zhou, Chang Kong, Yanbing Qing, Shaohua Gong and 7 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Junqiang ZhaoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Wenhui BaiDepartment of nursing, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qian ZhangSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Yujie SuSchool of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jinfang WangSchool of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Xiaoning DuDepartment of nursing, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yajing ZhouSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chang KongSchool of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yanbing QingSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Shaohua GongSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiqi MengSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Changyun WeiSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dina LiSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jian WuSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xuejing LiSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenjun ChenSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Jiale HuDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) implementation plays a crucial role in bridging the knowledge-action gaps and reducing health inequities. Little is known about its development in China. This study aims to provide an overview of the EBP implementation research progress in healthcare in China and identify gaps for future studies.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance on living reviews. We performed a literature search in four Chinese databases (i.e., China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Database, The VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine) and three English databases (i.e., Ovid MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and EMBASE), Google scholar, and Baidu scholar from 1996 to 2021. We included EBP implementation studies conducted in healthcare settings in China and were published in Chinese and English literature. The search will be run on a regular basis to monitor the development of new literature and determine when to update the review.

findingsOf the 11,276 records identified, we finally included 309 papers. The publications were on a sharp rise since 2013 and were predominantly from the nursing field (292/309, 94.50%). The commonly researched areas were symptom management (75/309, 24.27%), tube care (46/309, 14.89%), perioperative care (43/309, 13.92%), and fundamental care (43/309, 13.92%). Joanna Briggs Institute model was the most frequently used model to guide the implementation process (92/159, 59.75%). A median number of 8 people often comprised an implementation team, with 113 studies (36.57%) taking a multidisciplinary approach. 204 studies reported utilizing audit criteria to assist evaluation of evidence implementation rate with diversified methods measuring the criteria. Lack of knowledge, skills, and resources, and incomplete procedures or pathways were top barriers impeding EBP implementation. Leadership support was considered the most common facilitator. Education and training were the most frequently described implementation strategies for healthcare professionals and patients. Optimizing workflows and developing evaluation tools were the primary strategies adopted by organizations. 291 studies measured patient outcomes and 174 studies measured healthcare professional outcomes.

interpretationTo our knowledge, this scoping review is the first one to systematically examine the EBP implementation research progress in healthcare in China. Based on this review, we identified contributions that Chinese EBP implementation research made to the global community, and provided eight recommendations for Chinese researchers in conducting implementation studies in the future.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

ChinaEvidence-based practiceHealthcareImplementation ScienceKnowledge translationLiving scoping reviewLow- and middle-income country

Identifiers

PMID35036975
PMCPMC8743207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.