Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036909›Full record

ArticleBiofilm2022

Of biofilms and beehives: An analogy-based instructional tool to introduce biofilms in school and undergraduate curriculum.

Snehal Kadam, Ankita Chattopadhyay, Karishma S Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofilm, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Snehal KadamHull York Medical School, University of Hull, United Kingdom.
Ankita ChattopadhyaySchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, India.
Karishma S KaushikDepartment of Biotechnology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of biofilms and biofilm-based research is largely absent or minimally described in school and undergraduate life science curriculum. While it is well-established that microbes, such as bacteria and fungi, most often exist in multicellular biofilm communities, descriptions in standard biology textbooks continue to focus on the single-celled form of microbial life. We have developed an analogy-based instructional tool to introduce and explain biofilms to school and undergraduate students. The module employs an analogy with beehives, given that biofilms and beehives are both 'superorganism' states, to explain key biofilm features such as development and structure, chemical communication, division of labor and emergent properties. We delivered this analogy-based learning tool to a cohort of 49 students, including middle-to-high school and undergraduate students, and based on participant feedback and learnings, present a formal evaluation of the instructional tool. Further, we outline prerequisites and learning approaches that can enable the delivery of this module in classroom and virtual learning settings, including suggestions for pre-lesson reading, student-centred interactive activities, and specific learning objectives. Taken together, this instructional analogy holds potential to serve as an educational tool to introduce biofilms in school and undergraduate curricula in a relatable and comprehensible manner.

Indexed as

Analogy-based learningBeehivesBiofilmsBiologySchoolUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID35036909
PMCPMC8752906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.