Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036907›Full record

ArticleTransportation research interdisciplinary perspectives2022

Accessing hemodialysis clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Matthew Beaudet, Léa Ravensbergen, James DeWeese, William Beaubien-Souligny, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette, Norka Rios, Marie-Line Caron, Rita S Suri, Ahmed El-Geneidy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With CKD: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew BeaudetSchool of Urban Planning, McGill University, Canada.
Léa RavensbergenSchool of Urban Planning, McGill University, Canada.
James DeWeeseSchool of Urban Planning, McGill University, Canada.
William Beaubien-SoulignySection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Annie-Claire Nadeau-FredetteDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Norka RiosResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Canada.
Marie-Line CaronCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Canada.
Rita S SuriDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Canada.
Ahmed El-GeneidySchool of Urban Planning, McGill University, Canada.
McGill University · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transportation is a key element of access to healthcare. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique and unforeseen challenges to patients receiving hemodialysis who rely on three times weekly transportation to receive their life-saving treatments, but there is little data on the problems they faced. This study explores the attitudes, fears, and concerns of hemodialysis patients during the pandemic with a focus on their travel to/from dialysis treatments. A mixed methods travel survey was distributed to hemodialysis patients from three urban centers in Montréal, Canada, during the pandemic (n = 43). The survey included closed questions that were analysed through descriptive statistics as well as open-ended questions that were assessed through thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics show that hemodialysis patients are more fearful of contracting COVID-19 in transit than they are at the treatment center. Patients taking paratransit, public transportation, and taxis are more fearful of COVID-19 while traveling than those who drive, who are driven, or who walk to the clinic. In the open-ended questions, patients reported struggling with confusing COVID-19 protocols in public transport, including conflicting information on whether paratransit taxis allowed one or multiple passengers. Paratransit was the most used travel mode to access treatment (n = 30), with problems identified in the open-ended questions, such as long and unreliable pickup windows, and extended travel times. To limit COVID-19 exposure and stress for paratransit users, agencies should consider sitting one patient per paratransit taxi, clearly communicating COVID-19 protocols online and in the vehicles, and tracking vehicles for more efficient pickups.

Indexed as

Access to careCOVID-19HemodialysisParatransitTransportation

Identifiers

PMID35036907
PMCPMC8743465
OpenAlexW4206092104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.