Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036846›Full record

ArticleThe East African health research journal2021

Predictors and Barriers to Post Abortion Family Planning Uptake in Hai District, Northern Tanzania: A Mixed Methods Study.

Benjamin Asubiojo, Peter E Ng'wamkai, Benjamin C Shayo, Rose Mwangi, Michael J Mahande, Sia E Msuya, Eusebious Maro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The East African health research journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin AsubiojoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi Tanzania.
Peter E Ng'wamkaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi Tanzania.
Benjamin C ShayoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi Tanzania.
Rose MwangiDepartment of Behavioural and Social Science, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo), Moshi, Tanzania.
Michael J MahandeDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo), Moshi, Tanzania.
Sia E MsuyaDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo), Moshi, Tanzania.
Eusebious MaroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi Tanzania.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

Strengthening of Research Capacity for Junior Faculty in TanzaniaD43TW010138 · FIC · KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI MTETA, ALFRED KIEN · 2015 to 2020
$3.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost Abortion Care (PAC) encompassing family planning counselling and contraception provision is a key strategy to reducing maternal morbidity and mortality especially in countries with restrictive abortion laws. Various factors affect the uptake of PAC modern family Planning (FP) in different settings. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, assessment of factors and barriers to PAC modern FP uptake in Hai district, Northern Tanzania.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted using an explanatory sequential design. Exit interviews using questionnaires was conducted among 189 women. In-depth interviews were conducted with 26 healthcare providers (HCPs) and 28 women who received PAC in Hai district hospital, Machame hospital and Moshi Specialists health centre in Hai district. Quantitative data was analysed using a Statistical Package for Social Science (IMB SPSS Statistics for Windows version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA)). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were applied to estimate the predictors of uptake of PAC modern FP. Thematic content analysis was employed to explore barriers to uptake of post-abortion modern family planning.

resultsThe prevalence of uptake of modern family planning following PAC was 59/189(31.2%). 56% of the 189 women who received PAC did not receive counselling services on family planning. Marital status and partner's support were predictors of PAC modern family planning uptake (

conclusionSuboptimal modern family planning counselling during PAC contributes to the low uptake of contraceptives methods in this setting. Strategies are needed to improve PAC modern family planning services uptake. Strategies such as; provision of counselling skills to HCPs with comprehensive information targeting local contextual misconception and promoting PAC provision as a one-stop service.

Identifiers

PMID35036846
PMCPMC8751482
OpenAlexW3217702379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.