Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036822›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Endocrine Society2022

Congenital Micropenis: Etiology And Management.

Marianna Rita Stancampiano, Kentaro Suzuki, Stuart O'Toole, Gianni Russo, Gen Yamada, Syed Faisal Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Top ten surgical tricks-surgical management of adult acquired buried penis.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Article
  3. Gonadal Function and Its Evolution in 46,XX Testicular/Ovotesticular DSD.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Micropenis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  13. [Anthropometric assessment on prepubertal boys with hypospadias: a multicenter case series].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Micropenis in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marianna Rita StancampianoDepartment of Pediatrics, Endocrine Unit, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan 20132, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-5505
Kentaro SuzukiDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Institute of Advanced Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan.
Stuart O'TooleDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK.
Gianni RussoDepartment of Pediatrics, Endocrine Unit, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan 20132, Italy.
Gen YamadaDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Institute of Advanced Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan.
Syed Faisal AhmedDevelopmental Endocrinology Research Group, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0689-5549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the newborn, penile length is determined by a number of androgen dependent and independent factors. The current literature suggests that there are interracial differences in stretched penile length in the newborn and although congenital micropenis should be defined as a stretched penile length of less than 2.5 SDS of the mean for the corresponding population and gestation, a pragmatic approach would be to evaluate all boys with a stretched penile length below 2 cm, as congenital micropenis can be a marker for a wide range of endocrine conditions. However, it remains unclear as to whether the state of micropenis, itself, is associated with any long-term consequences. There is a lack of systematic studies comparing the impact of different therapeutic options on long-term outcomes, in terms of genital appearance, quality of life, and sexual satisfaction. To date, research has been hampered by a small sample size and inclusion of a wide range of heterogeneous diagnoses; for these reasons, condition-specific outcomes have been difficult to compare between studies. Lastly, there is a need for a greater collaborative effort in collecting standardized data so that all real-world or experimental interventions performed at an early age can be studied systematically into adulthood.

Indexed as

DSDgonadotropinsmicropenistestosterone

Identifiers

PMID35036822
PMCPMC8754418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.