Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036680›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Characterization of Cyclophilin from Thaumarchaeota

Vineeta Kaushik, Anchal, Manisha Goel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vineeta KaushikDepartment of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
AnchalDepartment of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
Manisha GoelDepartment of Biophysics, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-3696
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Archaea constitute separate domain of life and show resemblance with bacteria in their metabolic pathways while showing similarity with eukaryotes at the level of molecular processes such as cell division, DNA replication, protein synthesis, and proteostasis. However, the molecular machinery of archaea can be considered a simpler version of that found in eukaryotes because of the absence of multiple paralogs for any given molecular factor. Therefore, archaeal systems can possibly be used as a model system for understanding the eukaryotic protein folding machinery and thereby may help to address the molecular mechanism of various protein (mis)foldings and diseases. In the process of protein folding, the cis-trans isomerization of the peptide-prolyl bond is a rate-limiting step for the correct folding of proteins. Different types of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases can accelerate this reaction, e.g., cyclophilin, FKBP, and parvulin. Among the five phyla of the archaeal domain, homologs of the cyclophilin protein are found only in two. Here we have characterized a cyclophilin from an archaeal organism,

Identifiers

PMID35036680
PMCPMC8756454
OpenAlexW4200547893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.