Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036676›Full record

ReviewACS omega2022

Synthetic Matrices for Intestinal Organoid Culture: Implications for Better Performance.

Humendra Poudel, Karie Sanford, Peter K Szwedo, Rupak Pathak, Anindya Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Adaptive PEG Bis-dendron Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanics and Bioactivity.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploiting Matrix Stiffness to Overcome Drug Resistance.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Advances in the study of gastric organoids as disease models.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Advances towards the completeFaculty reviews · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Humendra PoudelDepartment of Chemistry, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
Karie SanfordDepartment of Chemistry, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
Peter K SzwedoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
Rupak PathakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States.
Anindya GhoshDepartment of Chemistry, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 South University Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6123-3209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organoids are three-dimensional (3D) self-renewing and self-organizing clusters of cells that imitate an organ's structure and function, making them an important tool in various fields ranging from regenerative medicine to drug discovery. Organoids can be developed

Identifiers

PMID35036676
PMCPMC8756583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.