Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036663›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2022

Open ventilator evaluation framework: A synthesized database of regulatory requirements and technical standards for emergency use ventilators from Australia, Canada, UK, and US.

Kate Kazlovich, Soumya Ranjan Mishra, Kamran Behdinan, Aviv Gladman, Jesse May, Azad Mashari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Building and Sustaining Open-Source Medical Device Projects.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate KazlovichInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Soumya Ranjan MishraDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kamran BehdinanDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aviv GladmanMackenzie Richmond Hill Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jesse MayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Azad MashariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of emergency use ventilators has attracted significant attention and resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. To facilitate mass collaboration and accelerate progress, many groups have adopted open-source development models, inspired by the long history of open-source development in software. According to the Open-source Hardware Association (OSHWA), Open-source Hardware (OSH) is a term for tangible artifacts - machines, devices, or other physical things - whose design has been released to the public in such a way that anyone can make, modify, and use them. One major obstacle to translating the growing body of work on open-source ventilators into clinical practice is compliance with regulations and conformance with mandated technical standards for effective performance and device safety. This is exacerbated by the inherent complexity of the regulatory process, which is tailored to traditional centralized development models, as well as the rapid changes and alternative pathways that have emerged during the pandemic. As a step in addressing this challenge, this paper provides developers, evaluators, and potential users of emergency ventilators with the first iteration of a pragmatic, open-source assessment framework that incorporates existing regulatory guidelines from Australia, Canada, UK and USA. We also provide an example evaluation for one open-source emergency ventilator design. The evaluation process has been divided into three levels: 1. Adequacy of open-source project documentation; 2. Clinical performance requirements, and 3. Conformance with technical standards.

Indexed as

COVID-19 medical equipmentDesign standardsElectromechanical devicesEmergency ventilatorsOpen-source hardwareOpen-source medical hardwarePandemic ventilatorPerformance evaluationRapid manufacturingRisk analysis

Identifiers

PMID35036663
PMCPMC8752315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.