Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036548›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2022

Developing a systematic approach to assessing data quality in secondary use of clinical data based on intended use.

Hanieh Razzaghi, Jane Greenberg, L Charles Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanieh RazzaghiDepartment of Pediatrics and Biomedical and Health Informatics Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Jane GreenbergMetadata Research Center College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
L Charles BaileyDepartment of Pediatrics and Biomedical and Health Informatics Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSecondary use of electronic health record (EHR) data for research requires that the data are

methodsWe reviewed current DQ literature, as well as experience from recent multisite network studies, and identified gaps in the literature and current practice. Derived principles were used to construct the conceptual framework with attention to both analytic fitness and informatics practice.

resultsWe developed a systematic framework that guides researchers in assessing whether a data source is

conclusionsOur framework provides a systematic process for DQ development. Further work is needed to codify practices and metadata around both structural and semantic data quality.

Indexed as

data qualityEHR datafit‐for‐use

Identifiers

PMID35036548
PMCPMC8753309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.