ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
Cost-sensitive learning strategies for high-dimensional and imbalanced data: a comparative study.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- MINERVA: a public XAI-powered platform advancing multi-target discovery in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Applying ensemble machine learning techniques to MRI scans to predict Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of XGBoost, TabNet, and FT transformer models for fatal crash prediction under extreme class imbalance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gene driven analytical learning model for accurate breast cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diffusion models vs. DCGANs for class-imbalanced lung cancer CT classification: A comparative study.Intelligence-based medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning for healthcare workforce attrition: a methodological study on the Watson healthcare synthetic benchmark.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Diffusion Models vs. DCGANs for Class-Imbalanced Lung Cancer CT Classification: A Comparative Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance-derived myocardial segmental motion curve complexity metrics for recovery ability in post-myocardial infarction patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning prediction models for in-hospital postoperative functional outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Machine learning algorithms for improved prediction of in-hospital outcomes after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a Chinese retrospective cohort study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics study in cancer: the role of feature engineering and modeling.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High dimensionality and class imbalance have been largely recognized as important issues in machine learning. A vast amount of literature has indeed investigated suitable approaches to address the multiple challenges that arise when dealing with high-dimensional feature spaces (where each problem instance is described by a large number of features). As well, several learning strategies have been devised to cope with the adverse effects of imbalanced class distributions, which may severely impact on the generalization ability of the induced models. Nevertheless, although both the issues have been largely studied for several years, they have mostly been addressed separately, and their combined effects are yet to be fully understood. Indeed, little research has been so far conducted to investigate which approaches might be best suited to deal with datasets that are, at the same time, high-dimensional and class-imbalanced. To make a contribution in this direction, our work presents a comparative study among different learning strategies that leverage both feature selection, to cope with high dimensionality, as well as cost-sensitive learning methods, to cope with class imbalance. Specifically, different ways of incorporating misclassification costs into the learning process have been explored. Also different feature selection heuristics have been considered, both univariate and multivariate, to comparatively evaluate their effectiveness on imbalanced data. The experiments have been conducted on three challenging benchmarks from the genomic domain, gaining interesting insight into the beneficial impact of combining feature selection and cost-sensitive learning, especially in the presence of highly skewed data distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.