ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to analyze and predict the COVID-19 outbreak.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Used in Communicable Disease Control: A Scoping Review.Public health reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of a novel AI-derived index for predicting COPD medical costs in clinical practice.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Simple mathematical model for predicting COVID-19 outbreaks in Japan based on epidemic waves with a cyclical trend.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A variant-informed decision support system for tackling COVID-19: a transfer learning and multi-attribute decision-making approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Modelling Polyphenol Extraction through Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction by Machine Learning inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Enhancing COVID-19 Classification Accuracy with a Hybrid SVM-LR Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the shanghai, New York, and Pakistan stock exchanges.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Improvement of Time Forecasting Models Using Machine Learning for Future Pandemic Applications Based on COVID-19 Data 2020-2022.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Using machine learning-based binary classifiers for predicting organizational members' user satisfaction with collaboration software.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Developing forecasting model for future pandemic applications based on COVID-19 data 2020-2022.PloS one · 2023Article
- Analysis of computational intelligence approaches for predicting disease severity in humans: Challenges and research guidelines.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Review
- Comparison of ARIMA model, DNN model and LSTM model in predicting disease burden of occupational pneumoconiosis in Tianjin, China.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Mathematical Models Supporting Control of COVID-19.China CDC weekly · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForecasting the time of forthcoming pandemic reduces the impact of diseases by taking precautionary steps such as public health messaging and raising the consciousness of doctors. With the continuous and rapid increase in the cumulative incidence of COVID-19, statistical and outbreak prediction models including various machine learning (ML) models are being used by the research community to track and predict the trend of the epidemic, and also in developing appropriate strategies to combat and manage its spread.
methodsIn this paper, we present a comparative analysis of various ML approaches including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor and Artificial Neural Network in predicting the COVID-19 outbreak in the epidemiological domain. We first apply the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) method to identify and model the short and long-run relationships of the time-series COVID-19 datasets. That is, we determine the lags between a response variable and its respective explanatory time series variables as independent variables. Then, the resulting significant variables concerning their lags are used in the regression model selected by the ARDL for predicting and forecasting the trend of the epidemic.
resultsStatistical measures-Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE)-are used for model accuracy. The values of MAPE for the best-selected models for confirmed, recovered and deaths cases are 0.003, 0.006 and 0.115, respectively, which falls under the category of highly accurate forecasts. In addition, we computed 15 days ahead forecast for the daily deaths, recovered, and confirm patients and the cases fluctuated across time in all aspects. Besides, the results reveal the advantages of ML algorithms for supporting the decision-making of evolving short-term policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.