Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036484›Full record

ArticleData in brief2022

High frequency accuracy and loss data of random neural networks trained on image datasets.

Ariel Keller Rorabaugh, Silvina Caíno-Lores, Travis Johnston, Michela Taufer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ariel Keller RorabaughUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Silvina Caíno-LoresUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Travis JohnstonStriveworks, Austin, TX, USA.
Michela TauferUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural Networks (NNs) are increasingly used across scientific domains to extract knowledge from experimental or computational data. An NN is composed of natural or artificial neurons that serve as simple processing units and are interconnected into a model architecture; it acquires knowledge from the environment through a learning process and stores this knowledge in its connections. The learning process is conducted by training. During NN training, the learning process can be tracked by periodically validating the NN and calculating its fitness. The resulting sequence of fitness values (i.e., validation accuracy or validation loss) is called the NN learning curve. The development of tools for NN design requires knowledge of diverse NNs and their complete learning curves. Generally, only final fully-trained fitness values for highly accurate NNs are made available to the community, hampering efforts to develop tools for NN design and leaving unaddressed aspects such as explaining the generation of an NN and reproducing its learning process. Our dataset fills this gap by fully recording the structure, metadata, and complete learning curves for a wide variety of random NNs throughout their training. Our dataset captures the lifespan of 6000 NNs throughout generation, training, and validation stages. It consists of a suite of 6000 tables, each table representing the lifespan of one NN. We generate each NN with randomized parameter values and train it for 40 epochs on one of three diverse image datasets (i.e., CIFAR-100, FashionMNIST, SVHN). We calculate and record each NN's fitness with high frequency-every half epoch-to capture the evolution of the training and validation process. As a result, for each NN, we record the generated parameter values describing the structure of that NN, the image dataset on which the NN trained, and all loss and accuracy values for the NN every half epoch. We put our dataset to the service of researchers studying NN performance and its evolution throughout training and validation. Statistical methods can be applied to our dataset to analyze the shape of learning curves in diverse NNs, and the relationship between an NN's structure and its fitness. Additionally, the structural data and metadata that we record enable the reconstruction and reproducibility of the associated NN.

Indexed as

Accuracy curveArtificial intelligenceClassificationEarly stoppingLoss curveMachine learningNeural architecture searchPerformance prediction

Identifiers

PMID35036484
PMCPMC8749157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.